PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9110015

Statistical methodology: II. Reliability and variability assessment in study design, Part A.

Abstract

Assessment of test reliability and validity is often complex. Although tests of correlation are frequently used to measure interest agreement, such indexes measure only the strength of the linear relationship between variables and may not provide an accurate assessment of the correspondence between test results. Inspection of interest differences, either visually or using the r1, may provide a better indicator of the correspondence between test results and accounts for measurement biases. Strength of association between categorical variables can be measured using related tests such as the kappa statistic. Test reliability may be assessed by retesting, but this is not practical in many cases when subject memory or learning may confound the results of repeated examinations. Several methods exist for determining reliability from a single test administration and for assessing the correspondence between answers to homogeneous test questions. In the continuation article (Part B) on this subject, the concept and assessment of validity will be examined in more detail, and techniques for maximizing the reliability and validity of questionnaires will be discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D J Karras. 1997. Statistical methodology: II. Reliability and variability assessment in study design, Part A.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.1997.tb03646.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

International emergency medicine: a review of the literature.

The field of international emergency medicine has grown rapidly over the past several decades, with an increase in the number of interested individuals and in the range of topics included under its rubric. One of the greatest obstacles, however, faced by international emergency medicine researchers and practitioners alike remains the lack of a high-quality, consolidated, and easily accessible evidence base of literature. In response to this perceived need, members of the Emergency Medicine Residents' Association International Emergency Medicine Committee, in conjunction with members of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine International Interest Group, embarked on the task of creating a recurring review of international emergency medicine literature. Articles for this first annual review, covering research published in 2005, were selected according to explicit, predetermined criteria that included both methodological quality and perceived impact of the research. It is our hope that this annual review will act as a forum for disseminating best practices, while also stimulating further research in the field of international emergency medicine.

Emergency Medicine↗