PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9110121

Controversies in preconditioning.

Abstract

Preconditioning is an effective mean of protecting the heart against prolonged ischemia by pretreating it with a minor insult, and the present paper reviews various controversies in this highly active field of research. In many models, adenosine plays a role by triggering the activation of protein kinase C. It may work in conjunction with other agents, such as bradykinin, but the putative role of noradrenaline is uncertain. Regulation of the enzyme producing adenosine (i.e., 5'-nucleotidase) has been reported during preconditioning but, because its activity does not seem to be associated with infarct size, it is unlikely that the hydrolase plays a pivotal role. Controversial data have been published on the involvement of mitochondrial ATPase, which may be ascribed to the poor time resolution of the experiments described; however, we do not believe that either acidosis or tissue ATP are important factors in triggering preconditioning. The role of glycolysis in the preconditioning effect remains to be firmly established; opposite mechanisms are activated in low-flow and stop-flow protocols. Although species differences regarding preconditioning exist, they seem to be more of a quantitative than a qualitative nature. The phenomenon could be clinically relevant because evidence is accumulating that preconditioning may take place during bypass surgery and coronary angioplasty if longer balloon-occlusion times are used.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J W de Jong, R de Jonge, A Marchesani, M Janssen, S Bradamante. 1997. Controversies in preconditioning.. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00053035

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Down-regulation of the inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor in mouse eggs following fertilization or parthenogenetic activation.

Fertilization in mammalian eggs is characterized by the presence of intracellular calcium ([Ca(2+)]i) oscillations. In mouse eggs, these oscillations cease after a variable period of time and this is accompanied by a decrease in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (IP3R) responsiveness and down-regulation of the IP3R type 1 (IP3R-1). To investigate the signaling pathway responsible for inducing IP3R-1 down-regulation during fertilization, mouse eggs were exposed to or injected with several Ca(2+)-releasing agonists and the amounts of IP3R-1 immunoreactivity evaluated by Western blotting. Exposure to ethanol or ionomycin, which induce a single [Ca(2+)]i rise, failed to signal down-regulation of IP3R-1. However, [Ca(2+)]i oscillations induced by injection of boar sperm fractions (SF), which presumably stimulate production of IP3, or adenophostin A, an IP3R agonist, both induced down-regulation of IP3R-1 of a magnitude similar to or greater than that observed after fertilization. Exposure to thimerosal, an oxidizing agent that modifies the IP3R without stimulating production of IP3, also initiated down-regulation of IP3R-1, although oscillations initiated by SrCl(2) failed to evoke down-regulation of IP3R-1. The degradation of IP3R-1 in mouse eggs appears to be mediated by the proteasome pathway because it was inhibited by preincubation with lactacystin, a very specific proteasome inhibitor. We therefore suggest that persistent stimulation of the phosphoinositide pathway in mouse eggs by the sperm during fertilization or by injection of SF leads to down-regulation of the IP3R-1.

Adenosine↗

Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors are downregulated in mouse oocytes in response to sperm or adenophostin A but not to increases in intracellular Ca(2+) or egg activation.

Fertilization in mammals stimulates a series of Ca(2+) oscillations that continue for 3-4 h. Cell-cycle-dependent changes in the ability to release Ca(2+) are one mechanism that leads to the inhibition of Ca(2+) transients after fertilization. The downregulation of InsP(3)Rs at fertilization may be an additional mechanism for inhibiting Ca(2+) transients. In the present study we examine the mechanism of this InsP(3)R downregulation. We find that neither egg activation nor Ca(2+) transients are necessary or sufficient for the stimulation of InsP(3)R downregulation. First, parthenogenetic activation fails to stimulate downregulation. Second, downregulation persists when fertilization-induced Ca(2+) transients and egg activation are inhibited using BAPTA. Third, downregulation can be induced in immature oocytes that do not undergo egg activation. Other than fertilization, the only stimulus that downregulated InsP(3)Rs was microinjection of the potent InsP(3)R agonist adenophostin A. InsP(3)R downregulation was inhibited by the cysteine protease inhibitor ALLN but MG132 and lactacystin were not effective. Finally, we have injected maturing oocytes with adenophostin A and produced MII eggs depleted of InsP(3)Rs. We show that sperm-induced Ca(2+) signaling is inhibited in such InsP(3)R-depleted eggs. These data show that InsP(3)R binding is sufficient for downregulation and that Ca(2+) signaling at fertilization is mediated via the InsP(3)R.

Adenosine↗

Functional properties of recombinant type I and type III inositol 1, 4,5-trisphosphate receptor isoforms expressed in COS-7 cells.

Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptors (IP(3)Rs) are ubiquitous intracellular Ca(2+) release channels whose functional characterization by transfection has proved difficult due to the background contribution of endogenous channels. In order to develop a functional assay to measure recombinant channels, we transiently transfected the rat type I IP(3)R into COS-7 cells. Saponin-permeabilized COS cells transfected with type I IP(3)R showed a 50% increase in inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP(3))-mediated Ca(2+) release at saturating [IP(3)] (10 micrometer) but no enhancement at subsaturating [IP(3)] (300 nm). However, cotransfection of the IP(3)R and human sarco/endoplasmic reticulum ATPase (SERCA)-2b ATPase cDNA resulted in 60 and 110% increases in Ca(2+) release at subsaturating and saturating doses of IP(3), respectively. IP(3) or adenophostin A failed to release (45)Ca(2+) from microsomal vesicles prepared from cells expressing either type I IP(3)R or SERCA cDNAs alone. However, microsomal vesicles prepared from cells doubly transfected with IP(3)R and SERCA cDNAs released 33.0 +/- 0.04% of the A23187-sensitive pool within 30 s of 1 micrometer adenophostin A addition. Similarly, the initial rate of (45)Ca(2+) influx into oxalate-loaded microsomal vesicles was inhibited by IP(3) only when the microsomes were prepared from COS cells doubly transfected with SERCA-2b and IP(3)R DNA. The absence of a functional contribution from endogenous IP(3)Rs has enabled the use of this assay to measure the Ca(2+) sensitivities of IP(3)-mediated (45)Ca(2+) fluxes through recombinant neuronal type I (SII(+)), peripheral type I (SII(-)), and type III IP(3)Rs. All three channels displayed a biphasic dependence upon [Ca(2+)](cyt). Introduction of mutations D2550A and D2550N in the putative pore-forming region of the type I IP(3)R inhibited IP(3)-mediated (45)Ca(2+) fluxes, whereas the conservative substitution D2550E was without effect. This assay therefore provides a useful tool for studying the regulatory properties of individual IP(3)R isoforms as well as for screening pore mutations prior to more detailed electrophysiological analyses.

Adenosine↗