PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9111988

Minor surgical procedures. Faculty development workshop.

Abstract

PROBLEM ADDRESSED: Minor surgical procedures are an important part of general practice. Family medicine faculty members must feel competent in performing common office procedures in order to teach them to residents. OBJECTIVE OF PROGRAM: To upgrade the skills of 25 family medicine faculty members in minor surgical procedures through a half-day workshop. MAIN COMPONENTS OF PROGRAM: The workshop covered seven procedures: removal of lumps and bumps, basic suturing, intrauterine contraceptive device insertion, endometrial biopsy, casting and splinting, injection of joints, and office microscopy. Small groups of faculty members spent 30 minutes at each station where brief didactic sessions were followed by hands-on practice. The workshop was evaluated using an evaluation form immediately after the workshop and questionnaires before and 6 months after. CONCLUSION: Teaching minor surgical procedures is an essential part of the curriculum in a family medicine residency program. A faculty development workshop in minor surgical procedures is one means of upgrading the skills of faculty members in order to ensure that they can teach adequately in this area.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Nasmith, E D Franco. 1997. Minor surgical procedures. Faculty development workshop.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9111988/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Predicting residents' performance: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Objective criteria for predicting residents' performance do not exist. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that global assessment by an intern selection committee (ISC) would correlate with the future performance of residents. METHODS: A prospective study of 277 residents between 1992 and 1999. Global assessment at the time of interview was compared to subsequent clinical (assessed by chief residents) and cognitive performance (assessed by the American Board of Pediatrics in-service training examination). RESULTS: ISC ratings correlated significantly with clinical performance at 24 and 36 months of training (r = 0.58, P <.001; and r = 0.60, P <.001 respectively). ISC ratings also correlated significantly with in-service exam scores in the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd years of training (r = 0.35, P =.0016; r = 0.39, P = 0.0003; r = 0.50, P = 0.005 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Global assessment by an ISC predicted residents' clinical and cognitive performances.

Clinical Competence↗

[Expected practical clinical skills and newly qualified physicians].

INTRODUCTION: We compared and contrasted the learned and intended practical clinical skills of the three Danish medical schools. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An anonymous questionnaire listing 210 practical clinical skills was posted to 226 newly qualified Danish physicians. They were asked if they could meet the minimum level for each of the skills, which had earlier been identified by a Delphi study. RESULTS: The response rate was 80%. None of the responders met the minimum of all the 210 skills. Only 8% (14) met the minimum level for at least 90% (189) of the skills. On average, the responders met the minimum for 74% (155) of the skills. More than 90% of the responders could take medical histories and carry out examinations. The responders did not meet 28 medical emergency procedures. DISCUSSION: We found that the clinical skills learned constituted 75% of those intended. Those responsible for pre- and postgraduate medical training should be aware of the discrepancy between expected and learned skills. We discuss the role of experts in the process of defining the core curriculum.

Clinical Competence↗