PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9112050

Commentary on equipment recommendations.

Abstract

The international standards for safe anaesthesia may all be satisfied with relatively limited resources. General standards deal with clinical and administrative autonomy, peer review, training, clinical practice and the role and working conditions of the anaesthetist. Additional recommendations deal with suggestions for the progressive acquisition of equipment and monitors as resources allow. These include: a light source, thermometer, sphygmomanometer and stethoscope, with an oxygen analyser if nitrous oxide is to be used, and a disconnect alarm if a ventilator is to be used (basic requirements); a low pressure oxygen supply failure alarm, devices mitigating against the supply of hypoxic gas mixtures, oximeter, capnograph, electrocardiograph and defibrillator (highly recommended); a spirometer, neuromuscular junction monitor and electronic thermometer (recommended); and finally devices such as volatile agent monitors and invasive blood pressure monitors for areas with ample resources.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

W B Runciman. 1993. Commentary on equipment recommendations.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9112050/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Perception of training needs and opportunities in advanced airway skills: a survey of British and Irish trainees.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: We surveyed delegates at the Group of Anaesthetists in Training (UK) meeting to investigate evidence of a training-gap (number of fibreoptic intubations believed to bestow competence vs. number actually performed). METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to and collected from delegates in person. Questions covered six areas, including experience of fibreoptic intubation and cricothyrotomy, fibreoptic intubation as a specialist skill and ethical issues. RESULTS: We received 221 replies (76%). All trainees believed competence to be achievable with 10 intubations (interquartile range (IQR) 10-20); the median number performed was 2 (IQR 0-4). This was statistically significant for the groups' senior house officers, 1st and 2nd year registrars and 3rd and 4th year registrars; P < 0.0001. Many final year trainees (12/20, 60%) also failed to achieve their competency target. Few trainees had seen or performed any cricothyrotomies (medians 0, IQRs 0-1 and 0-0). Most (195/208, 94%) believed that fibreoptic intubation was a core skill and 199/212 (94%) believed that all should be competent by completion of training. Ten percent (n = 208) felt it unethical to perform an awake training intubation with full consent and 10% believed it acceptable without explanation. Most (82.7%) would fibreoptically intubate an asleep patient (requiring intubation) without consent. CONCLUSION: Trainees reported a gap between their perception of competence and achievement in awake fibreoptic intubation. Simple and complex simulations and structured training programmes may help. Anaesthetists must address the ethics of clinical training in advanced airway management.

Anesthesiology↗