PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9119337

Occupational exposure.

H Sterzl-Eckert·H Greim
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Regarding the risk evaluation of mixtures in the workplace, the Working Group discussed whether there is a need to consider combination effects at the workplace and whether there is sufficient information on combination toxicology to suggest a scientific strategy for the evaluation of any mixture at the workplace. It was concluded that analytical definition of the mixture is a basic prerequisite for evaluation. The Working Group agreed that there is a special situation at the workplace because chemical compounds may be present at concentrations close to their effective threshold level; therefore, combination effects have to be taken into consideration, as shown by the data presented during the conference. Furthermore, observed-effect levels for individual substances have to be modified if the substances have the same mode of action or have the same target organs; no modification is necessary if the opposite has been shown. It was also concluded that the scientific database to date is insufficient for the proposal of a general approach. The assumption of additivity in all cases lacking data may more or less over-estimate the risk.

Explore related subjects

Administration, InhalationAnimalsDatabases, FactualDrug InteractionsGermanyHazardous SubstancesHumansIn Vitro TechniquesNo-Observed-Adverse-Effect LevelNoiseOccupational ExposureRisk AssessmentSkin AbsorptionSolventsSwineXenobioticsJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H Sterzl-Eckert, H Greim. Occupational exposure.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0278-6915(97)00095-1

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed1999

Aerosolized amphotericin B inhalations as prophylaxis of invasive aspergillus infections during prolonged neutropenia: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial.

We performed a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic inhalations with aerosolized amphotericin B (aeroAmB) to reduce the incidence of invasive aspergillus (IA) infections in patients after chemotherapy or autologous bone marrow transplantation and an expected duration of neutropenia of at least 10 days. From March 1993 until April 1996, 382 patients with leukemias, relapsed high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphomas, or solid tumors were randomized with a 13:10 ratio to receive either prophylactic aeroAmB inhalations at a dose of 10 mg twice daily or no inhalation prophylaxis in an unblinded fashion. The incidence of proven, probable, or possible IA infections was 10 of 227 (4%) in patients who received prophylactic aeroAmB. This did not differ significantly from the 11 of 155 (7%) incidence in patients who received no inhalation prophylaxis (P =.37). Moreover, no differences in the overall mortality (13% v 10%; P =.37) or in the infection-related mortality (8% v 7%; P =.79) were found. In contrast to other nonrandomized trials, we observed no benefit from prophylactic aeroAmB inhalations, but the overall incidence of IA infections was low.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1999

Regulation of pulmonary T cell responses to inhaled antigen: role in Th1- and Th2-mediated inflammation.

DO11.10 transgenic mice, expressing an OVA-specific TCR, were used to study pulmonary T cell responses to inhaled Ags. Before OVA inhalation, the activation of lung parenchymal T cells elicited both strong proliferative responses and IL-2 production. However, following Ag inhalation the proliferative responses of the lung T cells, when restimulated in vitro with OVA323-339 peptide or immobilized anti-CD3, were severely attenuated and associated with a decrease in the level of production of IL-2 but not IFN-gamma. Such immune regulation was tissue-specific, because T cell responses in the lymph nodes and spleens were normal. This dramatic aerosol-induced attenuation of parenchymal T cell proliferation was also observed in BALB/c mice immunized with OVA and in BALB/c mice following adoptive transfer of DO11.10 T cells bearing either a Th1 or Th2 phenotype. In mice that had received Th2 cells, the reduced proliferative responses were associated with a decrease in IL-2 expression but augmented IL-4 and IL-5 production. Invariably, the inhibition of proliferation was a consequence of the action of F4/80+ interstitial macrophages and did not involve alveolar macrophages or their products. These observations demonstrate that clonal expansion of T cells in the lung compartment is prevented following the onset of either Th1- or Th2-mediated inflammation. This form of immune regulation, which appears as a selective defect in IL-2-driven proliferation, may serve to prevent the development of chronic pulmonary lymphoproliferative responses.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1999

Long-term effect of inhaled budesonide in mild and moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the long-term efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We investigated the efficacy of inhaled budesonide on decline in lung function and respiratory symptoms in a 3-year placebo-controlled study of patients with COPD. METHODS: We used a parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled design in a singlecentre study, nested in a continuing epidemiological survey (the Copenhagen City Heart Study). Inclusion criteria were as follows: no asthma; a ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and vital capacity of 0.7 or less; FEV1 which showed no response (<15% change) to 1 mg inhaled terbutaline or prednisolone 37.5 mg orally once daily for 10 days. 290 patients were randomly assigned budesonide, 800 microg plus 400 microg daily for 6 months followed by 400 microg twice daily for 30 months, or placebo for 36 months. The mean age of the participants was 59 years and the mean FEV1 2.37 L or 86% of predicted. The main outcome measure was rate of FEV1 decline. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The crude rates of FEV1 decline were slightly smaller than expected (placebo group 41.8 mL per year, budesonide group 45.1 mL per year). The estimated rates of decline from the regression model did not differ significantly (49.1 mL vs 46.0 mL per year; difference 3.1 mL per year [95% CI -12.8 to 19.0]; p=0.7). Before the study, the minimum relevant difference was defined as 20 mL per year; this difference was outside the 95% CI. No effect of inhaled budesonide was seen on respiratory symptoms. 316 exacerbations occurred during the study period, 155 in the budesonide group and 161 in the placebo group. Treatment was well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: Inhaled budesonide was of no clinical benefit in COPD patients recruited from the general population by screening. We question the role of long-term inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of mild to moderate COPD.

Administration, Inhalation↗