PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9136041

Functioning free-muscle transplantation for the upper extremity.

Abstract

Functioning free-muscle transplantation (FFMT) is an advanced microneurovascular technique indicated in patients who have an injury with major functional muscle or muscle group loss or denervation and no locally available or ideal musculotendinous donor units. Over the 9-year period, from 1986 to 1994, 47 FFMTs were applied in patients who had severe hand and upper-extremity injuries (not including brachial plexus injury). Thirteen patients had 15 FFMTs to reconstruct muscle loss caused by severe Volkmann's ischemia. Seventeen patients had 21 FFMTs for reconstruction after severe crushing and traction injuries of the forearm or arm, with major muscle loss or major nerve injury. Nine patients, with 11 FFMTs, sustained major limb avulsion amputation for which replantation without nerve repair was done initially. FFMT was the only technique available to resolve the motor deficit and consequent deformity. Most patients achieved significant functional improvement.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D C Chuang. 1997. Functioning free-muscle transplantation for the upper extremity.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9136041/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Prospective research on musculoskeletal disorders in office workers (PROMO): study protocol.

BACKGROUND: This article describes the background and study design of the PROMO study (Prospective Research on Musculoskeletal disorders in Office workers). Few longitudinal studies have been performed to investigate the risk factors responsible for the incidence of hand, arm, shoulder and neck symptoms among office workers, given the observation that a large group of office workers might be at risk worldwide. Therefore, the PROMO study was designed. The main aim is to quantify the contribution of exposure to occupational computer use to the incidence of hand, arm, shoulder and neck symptoms. The results of this study might lead to more effective and/or cost-efficient preventive interventions among office workers. METHODS/DESIGN: A prospective cohort study is conducted, with a follow-up of 24 months. In total, 1821 participants filled out the first questionnaire (response rate of 74%). Data on exposure and outcome is collected using web-based self-reports. Outcome assessment takes place every three months during the follow-up period. Data on computer use are collected at baseline and continuously during follow-up using a software program. DISCUSSION: The advantages of the PROMO study include the long follow-up period, the repeated measurement of both exposure and outcome, and the objective measurement of the duration of computer use. In the PROMO study, hypotheses stemming from lab-based and field-based research will be investigated.

Arm Injuries↗