PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9143856

Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Practical treatment guidelines.

Abstract

Symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common condition in older men and has a significant impact on their daily lives. Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or open prostatectomy are currently the most effective therapies for BPH. TURP is, however, associated with clinically significant adverse events in 20% of patients. Therefore, patients who need treatment for BPH based on the presence of symptoms should also be offered other therapy options. Transurethral incision of the prostate is an effective therapy with minimal adverse effects in patients with a prostate not larger than 30 g. Minimally invasive procedures, such as electrovaporisation, laser prostatectomy, transurethral needle ablation, high intensity focused ultrasound, transurethral microwave therapy and insertion of prostatic stents, can be performed instead of the standard surgical procedures. They are either performed as outpatient procedures or are associated with shorter durations of hospitalisation than TURP; in addition, they can also be performed in high risk patients. The efficacy of these procedures lies between that of TURP and medical therapy. Medical therapy is becoming increasingly important in the treatment of patients with moderate symptoms of BPH. Both androgen-suppressing therapy and alpha-adrenoceptor blockade are well tolerated and effective modalities. Compared with placebo, both types of therapy produce improvements in maximum urinary flat rate and reductions in symptom scores of 15 to 20%. Finasteride, a potent 5 alpha-reductase inhibitor, must be given for 6 months before it effectiveness in a given patient can be assessed, and for at least 12 months to achieve maximum prostate shrinkage and the full extent of its other beneficial effects. This may be perceived as a disadvantage when compared with the rapid relief afforded by surgery or alpha-blockade. The efficacy of finasteride is also dependent on prostate size; it should not be tried in patients with a prostate volume of < 40 ml. On the other hand, finasteride may reverse the progression of the disease process. Of the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonists, terazosin, doxazosin and tamsulosin can be administered once daily. In contrast, prazosin, alfuzosin and indoramin must be administered twice daily, which may have a negative impact on patient compliance. Because of its specificity for alpha 1A-receptors, no dosage titration is needed when tamsulosin is used; in addition, in contrast with the other alpha-blockers used in BPH, tamsulosin lacks significant effects on blood pressure. On the other hand, nonselective alpha-blockers are preferable in hypertensive patients with BPH. The final decision about the best treatment for a particular patient must take into account the patient's preference after he has been informed of the different options.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T Tammela. 1997. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Practical treatment guidelines.. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-199710050-00004

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Differential effects of urapidil and doxazosin on heart rate.

OBJECTIVE: Although alpha-blockers are effective in lowering blood pressure, they may increase heart rate, an unwanted effect that could negatively affect outcome. However, the alpha-blocker urapidil might not increase heart rate due to its additional effect on 5-HT1A receptors. Therefore, we compared the effects of urapidil on heart rate with those of another alpha-blocker, doxazosin. METHODS: We performed a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study in 12 healthy males who received single oral doses of 60 mg urapidil, 4 mg doxazosin and placebo. Four hours following drug intake, heart rate and blood pressure were measured at rest and during exercise. RESULTS: Both doxazosin and urapidil decreased blood pressure to the same extent. Compared to placebo, resting heart rate was significantly increased by doxazosin (+25%, P < 0.05) but not by urapidil (+12%, n.s.). Resting heart rate with doxazosin was significantly higher than with urapidil (P < 0.05). Similarly, the rate pressure product (RPP) at rest was increased by doxazosin (+17%, P < 0.05) but not by urapidil (+6%, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the increase in heart rate caused by urapidil is less pronounced than that with doxazosin, a property that might favour urapidil in the treatment of arterial hypertension. In addition, only doxazosin (but not urapidil) increased the RPP at rest, a finding that might be helpful to explain why this drug was never shown to improve outcome in the treatment of arterial hypertension.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗

The synthetic TRH analogue taltirelin exerts modality-specific antinociceptive effects via distinct descending monoaminergic systems.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Exogenously administered thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) is known to exert potent but short-acting centrally-mediated antinociceptive effects. We sought to investigate the mechanisms underlying these effects using the synthetic TRH analogue taltirelin, focusing on the descending monoaminergic systems in mice. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The mice received systemic or local injections of taltirelin combined with either central noradrenaline (NA) or 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) depletion by 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) or DL-p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA), respectively, or blockade of their receptors. The degree of antinociception was determined using the tail flick and tail pressure tests. KEY RESULTS: Subcutaneously (s.c.) administered taltirelin exhibited dose-dependent antinociceptive effects in the tail flick and tail pressure tests. These effects appeared to be primarily supraspinally mediated, since intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) but not intrathecally (i.t.) injected taltirelin generated similar effects. Depletion of central NA abolished only the analgesic effect of taltirelin (s.c. and i.c.v.) on mechanical nociception. By contrast, depletion of central 5-HT abolished only its analgesic effect on thermal nociception. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) and i.t. injection of the alpha2-adrenoceptor antagonist yohimbine respectively reduced the analgesic effect of taltirelin (s.c. and i.c.v.) on mechanical nociception. By contrast, the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY-100635 (i.p. and i.t.) reduced the effect of taltirelin (s.c. and i.c.v.) on thermal nociception. Neither the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist ketanserin nor the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone altered the antinociceptive effect of taltirelin. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest that taltirelin activates the descending noradrenergic and serotonergic pain inhibitory systems, respectively, to exert its analgesic effects on mechanical and thermal nociception.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗

Characteristics and mechanisms of locomotion induced by intraspinal microstimulation and dorsal root stimulation in spinal cats.

Intraspinal microstimulation (ISMS) through a single microelectrode can induce locomotion in cats spinalized at T(13) 1 wk before (untrained) or after 3-5 wk of treadmill training. Here we study the optimal parameters of ISMS and the characteristics of locomotion evoked. ISMS was applied in the dorsal region of segments L(3)-S(1) at different lateralities (midline to 2.5 mm) and after an intravenous injection of clonidine (noradrenergic agonist). Kinematics and electromyographic recordings were used to characterize locomotion. ISMS could induce a bilateral locomotor pattern similar to that obtained with perineal stimulation, and the characteristics of locomotion varied according to the spinal segment stimulated. Mechanisms by which ISMS could evoke locomotion were then investigated by stimulating, inactivating, or lesioning different spinal structures. Dorsal root stimulation (DRS), just like ISMS, could evoke a variety of ipsi- and bilateral nonlocomotor movements as well as locomotor responses. This suggests that sensory afferent pathways are involved in the production of locomotion by ISMS. Microinjections of yohimbine (noradrenergic antagonist) in L(3) and L(4) segments or a complete second spinal lesion at L(3)-L(4) abolished all locomotor activity evoked by ISMS applied at more caudal segments. Progressive dorsoventral spinal lesions at L(3) or L(4) and restricted ventral lesions at L(4) further suggest that the integrity of the ventral or ventrolateral funiculi as well as the L(3)-L(4) segments are critical for the induction of locomotion by ISMS at L(5) to S(1) or by DRS at these caudal segments.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗