PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9145998

A collaborative approach to managing interstitial cystitis.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To establish that conventional protocols often do not provide an adequate framework for managing interstitial cystitis, and to describe the special role of the urologic caregiver in developing a collaborative relationship with interstitial cystitis (IC) patients that can allay fears and provide hope that this devastating disease can be managed effectively. METHODS: Epidemiologic studies and a decade of experience of IC patients and their physicians are utilized in developing a rationale for a collaborative relationship between urologic caregivers and IC patients. RESULTS: The symptoms of interstitial cystitis-pain, urgency, and urinary frequency-can have a profoundly disruptive effect on patients' lives and present unique challenges to physicians as urologic caregivers. The impact of IC on patients' lives needs to be accounted for empathetically, and appropriate referrals for depression, sexuality, or relationship problems should be made. Pain should be managed aggressively, and patients who have had delayed diagnosis or who have not responded to the traditional treatments should be educated about the array of medical, complementary/alternative, and self-help modalities available. CONCLUSIONS: A successful treatment paradigm requires that physicians and patients be knowledgeable about the array of medical and complementary/alternative therapies and that these be applied in a systematic but creative way. Through empathic support, information, and a flexible treatment protocol, patients will learn to trust the medical process and take an active part in the management of IC.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Slade, V Ratner, R Chalker. 1997. A collaborative approach to managing interstitial cystitis.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80328-8

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Event-related potential evidence for the processing efficiency theory.

The purpose of this study was to examine the central tenets of the processing efficiency theory using psychophysiological measures of attention and effort. Twenty-eight participants were divided equally into either a high or low trait anxiety group. They were then required to perform a simulated driving task while responding to one of four target light-emitting diodes. Cortical activity and dual task performance were recorded under two conditions -- baseline and competition -- with cognitive anxiety being elevated in the competitive session by an instructional set. Although driving speed was similar across sessions, a reduction in P3 amplitude to cue onset in the light detection task occurred for both groups during the competitive session, suggesting a reduction in processing efficiency as participants became more state anxious. Our findings provide more comprehensive and mechanistic evidence for processing efficiency theory, and confirm that increases in cognitive anxiety can result in a reduction of processing efficiency with little change in performance effectiveness.

Anxiety↗

Brief report: testing the factorial invariance of the CBCL Somatic Complaints scale as a measure of internalizing symptoms for children with and without chronic illness.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the factorial invariance of the Somatic Complaints subscale of the Child Behavior Checklist as a measure of Internalizing Behavior Problems across a sample of children with and without spina bifida. METHODS: Multisample confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare mother and father report on the Somatic Complaints subscale across a sample of children with spina bifida and a matched comparison sample of able-bodied children ages 8 through 11 years (N = 68 for mother report in each group; N = 54 for father report in the spina bifida group and 53 for the able-bodied group). RESULTS: Although there were no significant between-group differences in the magnitude of factor loadings, significantly more variance in scores on the Somatic Complaints scale was unrelated to Internalizing Behavior Problems for the spina bifida group, compared to the able-bodied group. There were no between-group differences when father data were analyzed, but the latent variable of Internalizing Behavior Problems explained little variance in the Somatic Complaints scale for either group. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal report of Somatic Complaints on the CBCL does not appear to measure Internalizing Behavior Problems in the same manner across groups of children with and without spina bifida. This suggests that the Somatic Complaints subscale should be interpreted with caution when measuring Internalizing Behavior Problems within this population.

Anxiety↗