PubMed · 9146154
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
N M Smith, L Brown. 1997. Dealing with aggressive patients and avoiding overinvolvement.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004045-199702000-00009
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Very little is known about the adult adaptation of individuals with sex chromosome abnormalities (SCA) except for a few reports based upon biased samples of clinically identified patients. This first report from the Denver SCA study on the adult psychosocial adaptation of 36 unselected propositi, identified at birth, shows a continuation of mild psychological and social problems. Psychiatric interviews and self-reported information revealed that adaptation is quite variable, with many of the nonmosaic propositi not faring as well as their siblings, but in a few instances exceeding the success of brothers and sisters. Within this group of SCA subjects a subset demonstrated more marked pathology and a tendency to over-rate their social adaptation relative to the psychiatric interviewer, suggesting that the exclusive use of self-report questionnaires may not provide accurate assessment of psychological characteristics in this and other special populations. The full adult SCA behavioral phenotype has not yet been established but is emerging through additional reports from this and other studies of unselected SCA adults.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
CONTEXT: Nonpharmacological treatments with little patient cost or risk are useful supplements to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of patients with chronic illness. Research has demonstrated that writing about emotionally traumatic experiences has a surprisingly beneficial effect on symptom reports, well-being, and health care use in healthy individuals. OBJECTIVE: To determine if writing about stressful life experiences affects disease status in patients with asthma or rheumatoid arthritis using standardized quantitative outcome measures. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial conducted between October 1996 and December 1997. SETTING: Outpatient community residents drawn from private and institutional practice. PATIENTS: Volunteer sample of 112 patients with asthma (n = 61) or rheumatoid arthritis (n = 51) received the intervention; 107 completed the study, 58 in the asthma group and 49 in the rheumatoid arthritis group. INTERVENTION: Patients were assigned to write either about the most stressful event of their lives (n = 71; 39 asthma, 32 rheumatoid arthritis) or about emotionally neutral topics (n = 41; 22 asthma, 19 rheumatoid arthritis) (the control intervention). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Asthma patients were evaluated with spirometry and rheumatoid arthritis patients were clinically examined by a rheumatologist. Assessments were conducted at baseline and at 2 weeks and 2 months and 4 months after writing and were done blind to experimental condition. RESULTS: Of evaluable patients 4 months after treatment, asthma patients in the experimental group showed improvements in lung function (the mean percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] improved from 63.9% at baseline to 76.3% at the 4-month follow-up; P<.001), whereas control group patients showed no change. Rheumatoid arthritis patients in the experimental group showed improvements in overall disease activity (a mean reduction in disease severity from 1.65 to 1.19 [28%] on a scale of 0 [asymptomatic] to 4 [very severe] at the 4-month follow-up; P=.001), whereas control group patients did not change. Combining all completing patients, 33 (47.1%) of 70 experimental patients had clinically relevant improvement, whereas 9 (24.3%) of 37 control patients had improvement (P=.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with mild to moderately severe asthma or rheumatoid arthritis who wrote about stressful life experiences had clinically relevant changes in health status at 4 months compared with those in the control group. These gains were beyond those attributable to the standard medical care that all participants were receiving. It remains unknown whether these health improvements will persist beyond 4 months or whether this exercise will prove effective with other diseases.