PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9188335

A conceptual framework for advanced practice: an action research project operationalizing an advanced practitioner/consultant nurse role.

K Manley
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A preliminary conceptual framework for an advanced practice/consultant nurse role is presented which links the role to its context and outcomes. The conceptual framework was developed in the process of analysing data from a 3-year action research study involving the operationalization of an advanced practice/consultant nurse role in a Nursing Development Unit. The skills and knowledge base of consultancy, underpinned by a strong nursing foundation, augmented by strong leadership and combined with the educator and researcher functions, are presented as the attributes of the advanced practitioner/consultant nurse. The facilitation of a transformational culture is highlighted as central to the skills and processes used within the role. Implications for the preparation and accreditation of the advanced practitioner/consultant nurse are highlighted.

Explore related subjects

CertificationConsultantsHealth Services ResearchHumansJob DescriptionModels, NursingNurse CliniciansNursing Evaluation ResearchOrganizational CultureOutcome Assessment, Health CareProfessional CompetenceJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

K Manley. 1997. A conceptual framework for advanced practice: an action research project operationalizing an advanced practitioner/consultant nurse role.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9188335/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine whether the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system (ABO OGS) can be assessed accurately from digital dental casts and whether there are statistical differences between digital and plaster dental casts in scoring the ABO OGS. METHODS: Thirty posttreatment plaster dental casts were selected and scanned by OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) to produce 30 corresponding digital dental casts. The plaster and digital casts were compared by using the criteria of the ABO OGS. Because the data were ordinal, a nonparametic statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed significant differences between the plaster and digital casts for occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, and total scores (P <.05). No significant differences were found for alignment, marginal ridges, overjet, and interproximal contacts. Buccolingual inclination was not included in this study because of inability to perform proper measurements with the OrthoCAD program. Mean differences of points deducted ranged from .03 point for marginal ridges to 5.07 points for the total score. The variable with the most points deducted related to occlusal relationships, and the fewest points were deducted for interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the current OrthoCAD program (version 2.2) was not adequate for scoring all parameters as required by the ABO OGS.

Certification↗