PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9194782

Sutureless technique: second version.

A I Gilbert·M F Graham
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Mesh repairs have revolutionized hernia surgery. When used to patch or plug a musculoaponeurotic abdominal wall defect, the results have been much better than traditional pure tissue repairs. The difference is simple: patch and plug techniques avoid tension on tissues. The improved sutureless repair not only avoids tissue tension, it obviates the need to suture the mesh. Fixation is achieved by intra-abdominal pressure, the same force that caused the hernia. Thorough dissection of the inguinal canal and the indirect sac is essential to avoid early failure. Whereas various repairs can be used with excellent results, there is no substitute for a complete dissection of the peritoneal sac well into the iliac fossa. The improved sutureless repair offers 2 advantages over the original version: (a) type III hernias can now be repaired without opening the canal's posterior wall, and (b) the incidence of clinically evident seroma has been reduced by 90%. Most primary and recurrent groin hernias can be repaired under local or regional anesthesia on an outpatient basis. Immediate ambulation and prompt recovery accompany this technique. Most patients resume full activity and employment by the end of the first week. The procedure is simple to learn, easy to perform and less costly than other techniques.

Explore related subjects

Anesthesia, ConductionAnesthesia, LocalHernia, InguinalHumansInguinal CanalMethodsSurgical MeshSuture TechniquesJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A I Gilbert, M F Graham. 1997. Sutureless technique: second version.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9194782/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2002

Motion sickness and postoperative vomiting in children.

BACKGROUND: Motion sickness is considered an important risk factor for postoperative nausea and vomiting in children. The aim of this study was to verify the impact of motion sickness on the incidence of vomiting after routine surgery in children, and to compare the incidence of vomiting, after combined regional/general anaesthesia, using either halothane or sevoflurane. METHODS: We prospectively studied 420 children (369 males and 51 females) who received general anaesthesia and inguinal field block for common paediatric surgery. The children were randomly allocated into one of two groups (halothane or sevoflurane). In the 200 children in the first group (H), general anaesthesia was induced and maintained with halothane, whereas in the 220 children in the second group (S), anaesthesia was induced and maintained with sevoflurane. RESULTS: There were 79 children with a prior history of motion sickness (MS+) and 341 without such a history (MS-). In the MS+ population, the incidence of vomiting was similar in both H and S groups, being around 33%. However, repeated episodes of vomiting in MS+ children were more frequent when halothane was used. In the MS- group, the incidence of vomiting was significantly greater in the H group (19%) than in the S group (8%). CONCLUSIONS: In the postoperative period, we found that MS+ children vomit more than MS- children, regardless of the inhalation anaesthetic used. However, MS- children displayed a higher incidence of vomiting when halothane was used rather than sevoflurane.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗
PubMed2002

Is haemostasis biological screening always useful before performing a neuraxial blockade in children?

BACKGROUND: Because of the lack of controlled studies, there is no consensus of opinion about the practice of routine haemostasis tests before neuraxial blockade in children. The purpose of this study was to compare the influence of two different strategies of coagulation evaluation on the incidence of diagnosed coagulopathies leading to a modification of the preoperative or anaesthetic management in children who were scheduled for caudal, epidural or intrathecal block. METHODS: For a 24-month period (period 1, retrospective study, n=751), haemostasis screening was undertaken only after family and personal history and physical examination in all patients. For the following 24 months (period 2, prospective study, n=958), a standardized questionnaire was used. In addition, routine tests (prothrombin, partial thromboplastin time, platelet count) were performed in children who where not yet walking. In older children, coagulation tests were undertaken as in period 1. RESULTS: Overall, 26 significant abnormalities were diagnosed. Coagulation tests were performed in 16.2% (period 1) and 78.2% (period 2) of the children, who were not yet walking. Routine tests did not improve the diagnosis of haemostasis abnormalities justifying a modification of the preoperative and anaesthetic management (2.2% from 406 children in period 1 vs 4.1% from 266 children in period 2). The predictive positive value of routine tests (period 2) was 19%, vs 45% for specific tests (period 1) (P < 0.001). In older children, the use of a standardized form increased the number of haemostasis screenings without improvement of diagnosis leading to modified preoperative management (0.3% from 315 children in period 1 vs 0.5% from 628 children in period 2). CONCLUSIONS: When routine testing is performed in nonwalking children, the screening number increases without leading to a higher number of anaesthetic management changes, suggesting that routine testing does not seem to provide much extra information in the absence of a positive history.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗