PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9198249

Thrombolytic therapy.

D Collen
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Despite their widespread use in patients with acute myocardial infarction, all currently available thrombolytic agents suffer from a number of significant limitations, including resistance to reperfusion, the occurrence of acute coronary reocclusion and bleeding complications. Therefore, the quest for thrombolytic agents with a higher thrombolytic potency, specific thrombolytic activity and/or a better fibrin-selectivity continues. Several lines of research towards improvement of thrombolytic agents are being explored, including the construction of mutants and variants of plasminogen activators, chimeric plasminogen activators, or plasminogen activators from animal or bacterial origin. Several of these new thrombolytic agents have been evaluated in animal models of venous or arterial thrombosis, some in pilot studies in patients with acute myocardial infarction and a few in large clinical trials with mortality end points. Definition of their relative therapeutic benefit, against presently available "classical" thrombolytic agents will require further dose-finding studies and randomized clinical trials.

Explore related subjects

AspirinClinical Trials as TopicHeparinHumansMetalloendopeptidasesStreptokinaseThrombolytic TherapyThrombosisTissue Plasminogen ActivatorJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Collen. 1997. Thrombolytic therapy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9198249/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Rapid desensitization protocols for patients with cardiovascular disease and aspirin hypersensitivity in an era of dual antiplatelet therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To review the available protocols for rapid desensitization of patients with aspirin hypersensitivity and apply the data for use in patients with cardiovascular disease who would benefit from the dual antiplatelet therapy. DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted via MEDLINE from 1966 to December 2006. Main search terms included: aspirin sensitivity, aspirin allergy, aspirin desensitization, aspirin-induced asthma, aspirin therapy, and aspirin intolerance syndrome. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Articles describing rapid aspirin desensitization protocols were selected for review. Literature pertaining to aspirin hypersensitivity, drug desensitization, and the use of aspirin and dual antiplatelet therapy was also examined. Three rapid desensitization protocols were identified and evaluated. DATA SYNTHESIS: While landmark studies demonstrated that dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel significantly reduces mortality and morbidity in acute coronary syndromes and coronary stenting, patients with aspirin hypersensitivity are frequently managed with clopidogrel alone with no supporting data. Approximately 10% of the population experiences hypersensitivity to aspirin, which can manifest as asthma exacerbations, rhinorrhea, angioedema, urticaria, and anaphylaxis. The hypersensitivity reaction is mediated through aspirin-directed antibodies or by excessive leukotriene production. The desensitization process involved depletion of these mediators, as well as down-regulation of leukotriene receptors. Two groups of investigators developed rapid protocols to desensitize patients with aspirin hypersensitivity safely and effectively. The rapid protocol developed by Wong provides benefits over other protocols with its low starting dose and completion in less than 3 hours, low incidence of adverse effects, and high success rate in aspirin desensitization. CONCLUSIONS: The Wong protocol is an attractive option for the rapid desensitization of patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel in the perimyocardial infarction period.

Aspirin↗