PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9205326

Outcomes system implementation for subacute care.

Abstract

The emergence of subacute care, seen as a cost-effective alternative to other, more expensive settings, is an important option for case managers. The current, rapid growth of subacute care, the diversity of subacute programs, the differences in patient types, and the lack of consistent standards to define subacute care illustrate the critical need for the case manager's role in balancing quality and cost. The lack of solid clinical outcomes data for patients treated in subacute care make it difficult for case managers to assess quality. Outcomes data, as a measurable dimension of quality, may include clinical effectiveness measures, associated costs, and patient/family satisfaction. Outcomes data can be used as a tool by the case manager to facilitate the coordination of patient care. Although there is an increased consumer interest in outcomes across all health care modalities, there is limited outcomes research available to document the efficacy of subacute care. As the pressure increases for outcomes data on subacute care by consumers and payers, efforts toward facility implementation of outcomes systems to assess subacute care are growing. The unique challenges to outcomes implementation in a skilled nursing facility-based setting are discussed, and strategies for successful implementation are presented. Basic subacute outcomes implementation issues of organizational support, staff participation, and data collection are reviewed. Ideas for case management involvement with facility implementation are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L Crist. Outcomes system implementation for subacute care.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9205326/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A comparison of assertive community treatment and intensive case management for patients in rural areas.

OBJECTIVE: This article reviews the evidence for the effectiveness of community-based services for rural areas, specifically assertive community treatment and intensive case management. Service delivery to persons with severe mental illness in rural areas is challenged by low population densities, limited services, and shortages of professionals. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search identified six studies of rural assertive community treatment, only two of which were controlled studies, and four rural intensive case management studies, only one of which was a controlled study. Assertive community treatment would seem ideally suited to areas lacking services because of its self-contained multidisciplinary treatment team approach. However, rural programs have been forced to make several adaptations to the assertive community treatment model, including smaller teams, less comprehensive staff, and less intensive services. There is no published evidence that these adaptations are able to produce the same results as full-fidelity teams. Some believe that intensive case management may be an alternative to assertive community treatment in rural settings because intensive case management emphasizes individual caseloads, fewer staff, less intensive contacts, and brokered services. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence suggests that intensive case management programs are effective only in community settings where there is an ample supply of treatment and support services. To build the evidence base for the effectiveness of these models, much more attention needs to be focused on evaluating the current wave of assertive community treatment and intensive case management dissemination in rural areas.

Case Management↗

Factors associated with specific language impairment and later language development during early life: a literature review.

It has been reported that 50% of children with specific language impairment (SLI) have persistent SLI, which has been associated with various risk factors. To date, however, there has not been a comprehensive review of studies into different risk factors that could be used by clinicians to facilitate parental counseling and individual case-management. Several studies about the factors associated with SLI were reviewed based on study design. This article presents a review of factors associated with later language development and SLI, and reviews the risk for children who have SLI during early life. The summary provides data including specific biologic and environmental factors that are significantly associated with SLI, to ensure early intervention for children with SLI in the presence of identified risk factors.

Case Management↗