PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9207169

A time to listen.

N P Coe
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

As methods of health care delivery, and advances in technology change our lives and practices, an essential element of personal and professional relationships has become neglected. We have stopped listening to each other, to our patients, and to ourselves; we have lost the art of communication. The essential aspects of optimal communication and the power of nonverbal signals are reviewed. Only by recognizing the importance of communication in surgical education, practice, and in fact in all aspects of daily life, will this encroaching societal deafness be rebuffed.

Explore related subjects

CommunicationGeneral SurgeryInterpersonal RelationsPhysician-Patient RelationsJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

N P Coe. 1997. A time to listen.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(97)00009-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗