PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9214789

Maximum entropy method for magnetoencephalography.

M Huang·R Aaron·C A Shiffman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

Simulations show that the maximum entropy method is a promising technique for image reconstruction in magnetoencephalography. An algorithm based on the work of Skilling and Bryan [1] and an appropriately modified expression for the "entropy" is shown to provide high-quality reconstructions of both isolated and dense distributions of neural current "dipoles", neglecting return currents. In particular the results are substantially superior to those obtained with the well-known minimum norm procedure.

Explore related subjects

ArtifactsEntropyHumansMagnetoencephalographyNormal DistributionComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M Huang, R Aaron, C A Shiffman. 1997. Maximum entropy method for magnetoencephalography.. https://doi.org/10.1109/10.553718

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗
PubMed2003

Are multiple CT scans required for planning curative radiotherapy in lung tumors of the lower lobe?

PURPOSE: Lung tumors located in the lower lobe are the most mobile. Multiple computed tomographic (CT) scans, which had been performed for radiotherapy planning, were analyzed to determine the minimal number of required scans. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six spiral CT scans (3 rapid and 3 slow) from 7 such patients were coregistered. Reproducibility of target volumes was defined as the ratio between the overlapping and encompassing volume (COM/SUM) from scans derived using one technique. Volumetric and dosimetric analyses were performed. RESULTS: Slow CT scans generated larger and more reproducible target volumes than rapid planning scans, with a mean COM/SUM ratio of 71.9 +/- 8.7% and 58.0 +/- 12.7%, respectively. When only a single slow CT scan was used for planning, the addition of a symmetrical 3D margin of 5 mm ensured 99% coverage of the "optimal" target volume, which was derived from summation of target volumes from all six scans. CONCLUSION: Planning target volumes (PTVs) derived from a single slow CT scan plus a 5-mm margin covered the "optimal" PTVs generated from six scans. Although these "slow PTVs" were larger, the increase in V(20) (the volume of lung tissue receiving a dose > or = 20 Gy) was limited. This indicates that only two CT scans, i.e., a full rapid scan of the entire thorax and a limited slow scan, are necessary for treatment planning in peripheral lung cancers.

Artifacts↗
PubMed2003

Can PET provide the 3D extent of tumor motion for individualized internal target volumes? A phantom study of the limitations of CT and the promise of PET.

PURPOSE: To characterize the limitations of fast, spiral computed tomography (CT) when imaging a moving object and to investigate whether positron emission tomography (PET) can predict the internal target volume (ITV) and ultimately improve the planning target volume (PTV) for moving tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: To mimic tumors, three fillable spheres were imaged while both stationary and during periodic motion using spiral CT and PET. CT- and PET-imaged volumes were defined quantitatively using voxel values. Ideal PTVs for each scenario were calculated. CT-based PTVs were generated using margins of 7.5, 10, and 15 mm to account for both organ motion and setup uncertainties. PET-based PTVs were derived with the assumption that motion was captured in the PET images and only a margin (7.5 mm) for setup errors was necessary. Comparisons between CT-based and PET-based PTVs with ideal PTVs were performed. RESULTS: CT imaging of moving spheres resulted in significant distortions in the three-dimensional (3D) image-based representations, and did not, in general, result in images well representative of either moving or stationary spheres. PET images were similar to the ideal capsular shape encompassing the sphere and its motion. In all cases, CT-imaged volumes were larger than that for the stationary sphere (range of excess volume from 0.4 to 29 cm(3) for stationary volumes of 2.14 to 172 cm(3)), but smaller than that for the true motion volume. PET-imaged volumes were larger than the true motion volume (difference from ideal ranged from 3 to 94 cm(3) for motion volumes of 1.2 to 243 cm(3)) and much larger than the stationary volume. Using CT data, geographic miss of some part of the ideal PTV occurred for 0 of 24 cases, 11 of 24 cases, and 18 of 24 cases using a 15-mm, 10-mm, and 7.5-mm margin, respectively. Geographic miss did not occur in any case for the PET-based PTV. The amount of "normal tissue" included in CT-based PTVs was dramatically greater than that included in PET-based PTVs. CONCLUSION: Fast CT imaging of a moving tumor can result in poor representation of the time-averaged position and shape of the tumor. PET imaging can provide a more accurate representation of the 3D volume encompassing motion of model tumors and has potential to provide patient-specific motion volumes for an individualized ITV.

Artifacts↗