PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9223342

Functionally differentiating two neuronal nitric oxide synthase isoforms through antisense mapping: evidence for opposing NO actions on morphine analgesia and tolerance.

Abstract

Several isoforms of neuronal nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) have been identified. Antisense approaches have been developed which can selectively down-regulate nNOS-1, which corresponds to the full-length nNOS originally cloned from the brain, and nNOS-2, a truncated form lacking two exons which is generated by alternative splicing, as demonstrated by decreases in mRNA levels. Antisense treatment also lowers nNOS enzymatic activity. Down-regulation of nNOS-1 prevents the development of morphine tolerance. Whereas morphine analgesia is lost in control and mismatch-treated mice given daily morphine injections for 5 days, mice treated with antisense probes targeting nNOS-1 show no decrease in their morphine sensitivity over the same time period. Conversely, an antisense probe selectively targeting nNOS-2 blocks morphine analgesia, shifting the morphine dose-response curve over 2-fold to the right. Both systems are active at the spinal and the supraspinal levels. An antisense targeting inducible NOS is inactive. Studies with NG-nitro-L-arginine, which does not distinguish among NOS isoforms, indicate that the facilitating nNOS-2 system predominates at the spinal level while the inhibitory nNOS-1 system is the major supraspinal nNOS system. Thus, antisense mapping distinguishes at the functional level two isoforms of nNOS with opposing actions on morphine actions. The ability to selectively down-regulate splice variants opens many areas in the study of nNOS and other proteins.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

Y A Kolesnikov, Y X Pan, A M Babey, S Jain, R Wilson, G W Pasternak. 1997-07-22. Functionally differentiating two neuronal nitric oxide synthase isoforms through antisense mapping: evidence for opposing NO actions on morphine analgesia and tolerance.. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.94.15.8220

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Self-evaluation of knowledge and competence with regard to the treatment of pain].

In a survey completed at our hospital, 519 doctors and nurses were asked to evaluate their own knowledge and competence with regard to the treatment of various types of pain, including non-pharmacologic treatment methods. A total of 473 responded to the questionnaire. In the study, cancer-related pain and pain from causes other than cancer were assessed in separate population groups. Of the doctors, 58% evaluated their knowledge of nociceptive pain as very good or fairly good. The corresponding findings for neuropathic pain were 31%, for psychological pain 27%, for social pain 25% and for spiritual and existential aspects of pain 22%. The nurses scored lower than the doctors on knowledge and competence in relation to nociceptive and neuropathic pain (32% and 18% respectively), and higher on treatment of the psychological and social aspects of pain (44% and 36% respectively). Many of the doctors and nurses evaluated their knowledge as fairly poor or very poor with regard to nonpharmacologic treatment methods. In both professions 80% answered that depression was seen fairly often or very often among these patients.

Analgesia