PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9223860

[Thoracoscopic cutting needle biopsy].

Abstract

We presented a new method of percutaneous cutting needle biopsy under the thoracoscope. Percutaneous cutting needles for lung tumor have been abandoned because the risk of hemorrhage, death, and pneumothorax is much greater with these instruments than the computed tomographic guided needle aspiration. On the other hand, thoracoscopic stapled lung wedge resection is easy to obtain a good sample for any lung disease, but should be needed two or three staples, and waste a time, in the case following lobectomy was needed for malignancy. This thoracoscopic cutting needle biopsy was easy to obtain a specimen for the frozened section diagnosis. Under the view of thoracoscope, percutaneous cutting needle biopsy is safety, saving the cost for staples and easy to control the bleeding from the lung. The indication of this thoracoscopic cutting needle biopsy is the case that could not obtain the precise diagnosis by the preoperative biopsy and imaging diagnosis might be suspicious a malignant tumor.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Sugiyama, S Koyama, H Morita, K Mino, M Ikeya, M Tsuda, T Misaki, K Matsui, M Kitagawa. 1997. [Thoracoscopic cutting needle biopsy].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9223860/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Targeting difficult accessible breast lesions: MRI-guided needle localization using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet.

PURPOSE: To report the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided needle localization for diagnosis of MRI detected suspicious breast lesions located in difficult accessible regions of the breast, using the freehand method in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In five patients with five MRI-only breast lesions underwent MRI-guided needle localization for histopathologic evaluation of the lesions. All interventional procedures were performed in a 3.0 T MRI system with the patient in prone position and by using a dedicated phased array breast coil. MRI-guided needle localizations were performed by using a freehand technique. In our study, the high-resolution scan allowed preprocedural localization of all lesions without use of contrast enhancement. In all cases contrast-enhanced MRI was performed after insertion of the wire to confirm the tip of the wire in direct contact with the enhancing lesion. RESULTS: Needle localizations were performed in five patients. Histopathologic evaluation of tissue after surgery excision biopsy revealed one lymph node, three invasive ductal carcinoma and one ductal carcinoma in situ. Lesion size varied from 6 to 30 mm. Mean duration time was 25 min. No complications occurred during the intervention method. In the patient with the benign lesion control MRI of the breast after 6 months confirmed lesion removal. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-guided needle localization by using a freehand technique in a 3.0 T closed bore magnet is a safe and accurate method for diagnosis of difficult accessible breast lesions only visible on MRI.

Biopsy, Needle↗