PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9225894

Peer discussion on training physicians to be competent communicators: support for a multiple discourse approach.

Abstract

To consider medical educators' views about training physicians to be competent communicators, a focus group was conducted at a large southeastern medical college with faculty responsible for training interns and residents to be competent communicators. The medical school was undergoing a curriculum review and instructional development process, including an examination of the methods being used to teach communication. A discussion of a teaching faculty committee revealed several themes, including the foundational assumption that communication is a natural ability that some have and others do not. Other notions likely to affect the educators' beliefs about the importance and effectiveness of communication education include the ideas that courtesy is synonymous with good communication and that although a few fundamentals might be transmitted, experience is the best teacher. Participants identified several audiences, in addition to patients, with whom they communicate as part of their profession, including other physicians, other health care providers (e.g., nurses and lab technicians), and hospital administrators, health care insurers, and others responsible for evaluating physicians' performance. The implications of this project for the development of medical communication courses within a multiple discourse approach are discussed.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R Parrott, T Huff, M Kilgore, M Williams. 1997. Peer discussion on training physicians to be competent communicators: support for a multiple discourse approach.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007611-199707000-00012

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Information-sharing among couples considering multifetal pregnancy reduction.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the information-sharing strategies of couples considering fetal reduction, and the impact of these strategies on the chances of encountering hostility in their social networks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional design of semistructured qualitative interviews, coded with respect to sharing strategies and level of personally directed hostility encountered. SETTING: Multiple Pregnancy Management Program, Comprehensive Genetics, New York, New York. PATIENT(S) AND INTERVENTION(S): Fifty women and their partners who were making a first visit to our maternal-fetal management facility, in order to consider the possibility of multifetal reduction as a pregnancy-management strategy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Development of information-sharing strategies, and the chances of encountering personally directed hostility regarding multifetal reduction associated with more and less selective strategies. RESULT(S): Four information-sharing strategies emerged from the analysis. Two of these strategies were relatively open (extended network, and both parents). Two other strategies were relatively selective (qualified family and friends, and defended relationship). The selective strategies were significantly less likely to encounter to encounter personally directed hostility (odds ratio, 3.88; 95% confidence intervals, 0.87-17.30). CONCLUSION(S): Selective sharing of information for couples considering multifetal prgnancy reduction is a potentially useful strategy for moderating potentially stressful relationships in their social networks. Clinics should find a way of integrating the discussion of selective sharing into their clinic's cultural repertoire of patient-support services.

Communication↗