PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9238505

Intersubject analysis of fMRI data using spatial normalization.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T A Zeffiro, G F Eden, R P Woods, J W VanMeter. 1997. Intersubject analysis of fMRI data using spatial normalization.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0056-2_26

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Linear coupling between cerebral blood flow and oxygen consumption in activated human cortex.

The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that, within a specific cortical unit, fractional changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption (CMR(O(2))) are coupled through an invariant relationship during physiological stimulation. This aim was achieved by simultaneously measuring relative changes in these quantities in human primary visual cortex (V1) during graded stimulation with patterns designed to selectively activate different populations of V1 neurons. Primary visual cortex was delineated individually in each subject by using phase-encoded retinotopic mapping. Flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery MRI, in conjunction with blood oxygenation-sensitive MRI and hypercapnic calibration, was used to monitor CBF and CMR(O(2)). The stimuli used included (i) diffuse isoluminant chromatic displays; (ii) high spatial-frequency achromatic luminance gratings; and (iii) radial checkerboard patterns containing both color and luminance contrast modulated at different temporal rates. Perfusion responses to each pattern were graded by varying luminance and/or color modulation amplitudes. For all stimulus types, fractional changes in blood flow and oxygen uptake were found to be linearly coupled in a consistent ratio of approximately 2:1. The most potent stimulus produced CBF and CMR(O(2)) increases of 48 +/- 5% and 25 +/- 4%, respectively, with no evidence of a plateau for oxygen consumption. Estimation of aerobic ATP yields from the observed CMR(O(2)) increases and comparison with the maximum possible anaerobic ATP contribution indicate that elevated energy demands during brain activation are met largely through oxidative metabolism.

Brain Mapping

A dissociation between spatial and identity matching in callosotomy patients.

Although they are structurally similar, the two hemispheres of the human brain have many functional asymmetries. Some of these, such as language and motor control, have been well characterized. Others, such as visuospatial asymmetries, are less well understood. Many researchers have noted that the right hemisphere appears to be specialized for visuospatial processing. We investigated the abilities of the divided cerebral hemispheres of two callosotomy patients to perform discriminations based on spatial or identity information. The data revealed a robust right-hemisphere superiority for spatial judgments. In contrast, the left hemisphere was somewhat better than the right at making identity judgments. These results suggest that the right hemisphere is specialized for spatial processing, and the left is specialized for pattern recognition.

Brain Mapping

Pain perception: is there a role for primary somatosensory cortex?

Anatomical, physiological, and lesion data implicate multiple cortical regions in the complex experience of pain. These regions include primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, anterior cingulate cortex, insular cortex, and regions of the frontal cortex. Nevertheless, the role of different cortical areas in pain processing is controversial, particularly that of primary somatosensory cortex (S1). Human brain-imaging studies do not consistently reveal pain-related activation of S1, and older studies of cortical lesions and cortical stimulation in humans did not uncover a clear role of S1 in the pain experience. Whereas studies from a number of laboratories show that S1 is activated during the presentation of noxious stimuli as well as in association with some pathological pain states, others do not report such activation. Several factors may contribute to the different results among studies. First, we have evidence demonstrating that S1 activation is highly modulated by cognitive factors that alter pain perception, including attention and previous experience. Second, the precise somatotopic organization of S1 may lead to small focal activations, which are degraded by sulcal anatomical variability when averaging data across subjects. Third, the probable mixed excitatory and inhibitory effects of nociceptive input to S1 could be disparately represented in different experimental paradigms. Finally, statistical considerations are important in interpreting negative findings in S1. We conclude that, when these factors are taken into account, the bulk of the evidence now strongly supports a prominent and highly modulated role for S1 cortex in the sensory aspects of pain, including localization and discrimination of pain intensity.

Brain Mapping