PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9240557

Solid localization marker for MR imaging.

B R Condon·D M Hadley
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A solid, stable material that can be easily cut into unique, identifiable shapes was compared with other localization markers used in magnetic resonance imaging to determine relaxation characteristics and chemical shift. The solid marker and the conventional oil-based markers caused substantial chemical shift artifacts and so should never be used when high levels of spatial accuracy are necessary, such as in stereotaxy. Although it had the lowest T2 of all the substances tested, the solid marker was useful in identifying structures when different coils, sequences, and fields of view were used.

Explore related subjects

ArtifactsCopper SulfateFish OilsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMuscle, SkeletalPetrolatumPlasticizersPolyvinyl ChlorideComparative StudyJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

B R Condon, D M Hadley. 1997. Solid localization marker for MR imaging.. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.204.2.9240557

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2026

Striping artifact removal in VisiumHD data through nuclear counts modeling.

MOTIVATION: 10x Genomics VisiumHD enables spatial transcriptomics at 2 µm × 2 µm resolution but exhibits slide-specific, non-periodic striping artifacts due to lane-width variability. These multiplicative row/column effects distort bin total counts and can bias downstream analyses. The state-of-the-art destriping approach is the normalization procedure used as a preprocessing step in bin2cell; it applies sequential high-quantile row- then column-wise normalization, which is asymmetric and can introduce edge effects/macro-stripes and distortions of large-scale total-count structure. RESULTS: We propose a statistical destriping approach that leverages nuclei segmentation from the co-registered H&E image. Assuming transcript abundance is constant within each nucleus, we model bin counts with a negative binomial distribution whose mean is a product of a nucleus-specific concentration and row- and column-specific stripe-factors reflecting lane-width variation. We fit all parameters in a generalized linear modeling framework with cross-validated regularization on stripe-factors and iterative dispersion estimation, and use the fitted parameters to correct the observed counts into a destriped image. On synthetic data with known ground truth, our method improves stripe-factor estimation accuracy and reduces error in corrected counts relative to bin2cell and bin2cell-derived baselines. Across four public VisiumHD slides, it consistently lowers striping intensity while substantially better preserving biological signal present in the large-scale global count structure and avoiding the artifacts introduced by other methods. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All source code and links to publicly available data used for this study are available at https://github.com/paolamalsot/destriping-GLM.

Artifacts↗
PubMed1999

Context-dependent Taq-polymerase-mediated nucleotide alterations, as revealed by direct sequencing of the ZNF189 gene: implications for mutation detection.

We have recently reported on the genetic organisation of a novel Krüppel-like zinc finger, ZNF189, located to 9q22-q31. In that study we found no mutations in the coding sequence when using ZNF189 as a candidate gene for sporadic basal cell cancer and squamous cell cancer. Here, by direct sequencing of the proximal promotor of ZNF189, mutations were found to appear in a small hot-spot region in over 50% of analysed tumour samples, the majority being G to A substitutions. The hot-spot region spans a 24bp G-rich region. Repeated analyses of the original sample lysates fail to confirm each of these mutations; and frequently new mutations appear at neighbouring positions. Subsequent analysis with serial dilutions of genomic DNA and a cosmid harbouring the wild-type ZNF189 gene demonstrate that these sequence-specific alterations arise in the outer PCR-amplification when 50 copies or less of template are used. Although the mechanism of how these context-specific alterations arise is not proven, the results demonstrate a previously unreported type of PCR-mediated sequence-specific alteration that easily could have been interpreted as being of clinical relevance. The phenomena observed show that mutations detected by direct sequencing can be caused by PCR-introduced alterations. Consequently, this should be of general caution in mutation analysis of disease gene candidates when using small amounts of template, such as microdissected biopsies.

Artifacts↗
PubMed1999

Orientation of DNA replication establishes mating-type switching pattern in S. pombe.

The fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe normally has haploid cells of two mating types, which differ at the chromosomal locus mat1. After two consecutive asymmetric cell divisions, only one in four 'grand-daughter' cells undergoes a 'mating-type switch', in which genetic information is transferred to mat1 from the mat2-P or mat3-M donor loci. This switching pattern probably results from an imprinting event at mat1 that marks one sister chromatid in a strand-specific manner, and is related to a site-specific, double-stranded DNA break at mat1. Here we show that the genetic imprint is a strand-specific, alkali-labile DNA modification at mat1. The DNA break is an artefact, created from the imprint during DNA purification. We also propose and test the model that mat1 is preferentially replicated by a centromere-distal origin(s), so that the strand-specific imprint occurs only during lagging-strand synthesis. Altering the origin of replication, by inverting mat1 or introducing an origin of replication, affects the imprinting and switching efficiencies in predicted ways. Two-dimensional gel analysis confirmed that mat1 is preferentially replicated by a centromere-distal origin(s). Thus, the DNA replication machinery may confer different developmental potential to sister cells.

Artifacts↗