PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9246960

A study on prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean sections--is it worthwhile?

S K Yip·T K Lau·M S Rogers
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To study the effect of single-dose prophylactic Augmentin on patients undergoing cesarean section. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Three hundred and twenty women undergoing cesarean section were randomized into two groups in a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. One hundred and sixty women were allocated to receive a single-dose of 1.2 g Augmentin at induction of anesthesia and 160 were allocated to a control group who received placebo. The following post-cesarean outcome parameters were compared between the two groups: duration of hospital stay, febrile morbidity, urine microscopy, bacteriuria, endometritis, and wound infection. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the duration of post-operative hospital stay or the incidence of febrile morbidity, endometritis, and wound infection. However, the study group had fewer post-operative abnormalities in urine microscopy (p < 0.05) and bacteriuria (p < 0.01). The bacterial flora were also different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Single-dose prophylactic Augmentin did not produce any clinically significant improvement in the post-operative course of patients undergoing cesarean section. If proper surgical techniques are followed in association with closed rectus sheath drainage, it is unlikely that any trial of antibiotics will be able to demonstrate any clinically significant outcome.

Explore related subjects

AmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsCesarean SectionClavulanic AcidClavulanic AcidsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansPenicillinsPlacebosPregnancyPreoperative CareSurgical Wound InfectionClinical TrialJournal ArticleRandomized Controlled Trial

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S K Yip, T K Lau, M S Rogers. 1997. A study on prophylactic antibiotics in cesarean sections--is it worthwhile?. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016349709024581

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Open-label, randomized comparison trial of long-term outcomes of levofloxacin versus standard antibiotic therapy in acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This study investigated whether treating acute exacerbations of COPD (AE-COPD) with levofloxacin modifies the long-term outcome of COPD patients in comparison with standard antibiotic regimens. METHODS: A 6-month open-label clinical trial of AE-COPD patients compared the outcomes of treating with levofloxacin versus standard therapy (clarithromycin, cefuroxime, or amoxicillin/clavulanate) at recommended doses for 10 days. Several variables were analysed: pulse oximetry, FEV1, health-related quality of life, infection-free interval, number of exacerbations, hospitalizations due to an exacerbation and mortality. RESULTS: Of the 116 patients initially enrolled, completion or withdrawal information was available for 50 patients in the levofloxacin arm and 52 in the standard therapy arm. At the end of the study, there were no differences in mortality (17.8% vs. 22.9%, P = 0.53), number of exacerbations (33 vs. 41, P = 0.40), pulse oximetry (median 91.71% vs. 92.46%, P = 0.18), FEV1 (median 51.31% vs. 47.14%, P = 0.30), health-related quality of life (median 8.63 vs. 10.75, P = 0.94) and infection-free interval (median 112 vs. 101 days, P = 0.72), for the levofloxacin and standard therapy, respectively. However, 12 out of 33 (33.6%) exacerbations treated with levofloxacin required in-hospital management versus 27 out of 41 (65.8%) treated with standard therapy (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: This preliminary study suggests that 10-day treatment of AE-COPD with levofloxacin is associated with a reduction in hospitalizations compared with standard antibiotics despite there being no significant benefit in other outcome variables.

Amoxicillin↗
PubMed2007

The impact of oral disease and nonsurgical treatment on bacteremia in children.

BACKGROUND: The authors examine the role of dental disease and nonsurgical dental procedures in the incidence and duration of bacteremia in children. METHODS: The authors randomized a group of children to receive amoxicillin or a placebo before dental rehabilitation in an operating room setting. They collected eight blood draws at the following times: two minutes after intubation (draw 1); after dental restorations, pulp therapy and cleaning (draw 2); 10 minutes later (draw 3); and five draws during and after dental extractions (draws 4-8). The authors compared dental disease parameters and the type of dental procedures performed with the incidence and duration of bacteremia. RESULTS: The authors enrolled 100 children (aged 1-8 years) in the study. The incidence of bacteremia from draw 2 was 20 percent in the placebo group and 6 percent in the amoxicillin group (P = .07), and the incidence from draw 3 was 16 percent in the placebo group and zero percent in the amoxicillin group (P = .03). Subjects with higher gingival scores were more likely to have a bacteremia for draw 2 (P = .01). The authors found that subjects in the group with bacteremia for draw 3 had undergone more pulpotomies than did subjects in the group without bacteremia for draw 3 (3 +/- 2.5 standard deviation [SD] versus 1.5 +/- 1.6 SD, P = .04), while they found almost no differences for draw 2. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that gingival disease has an impact on bacteremia after dental restorations and prophylaxis. Although antibiotics have an impact, they do not eliminate bacteremia altogether.

Amoxicillin↗
PubMed2006

Simultaneous determination of beta-lactamic antibiotics by a new high-performance low-pressure chromatographic system using a multisyringe burette coupled to a monolithic column (MSC).

A technique based on multisyringe chromatography (MSC) was developed to determine three beta-lactamic antibiotics. Amoxicillin (AMOXI), ampicillin (AMPI) and cephalexin (CEPHA) were analyzed using a system with a very simple design and very low-cost equipment consisting of a multisyringe module, three low-pressure solenoid valves, a monolithic Chromolith Flash RP-18e column and a diode array spectrophotometric detector monitoring at 250 nm. Mobile phases containing methanol:acetic acid (0.1 M)-sodium acetate (0.1 M), pH 6.2, were tested for various ratios of methanol:acetic acid-sodium acetate, but a ratio of 10:90 gave optimum results with a flow rate of 2 ml min(-1). Validation parameters were evaluated for amoxicillin. The response to amoxicillin was linear over the range 0.04-0.4 mg/mL, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9996; precisions, evaluated as the repeatability for 0.04, 0.16 and 0.4 mg/mL amoxicillin, were 0.6%, 0.1% and 0.6%, respectively. Recovery from a generic formulation of amoxicillin was evaluated. The method showed selectivity in the presence of excipients commonly used in capsules, and satisfactory specificity was observed for amoxicillin and hydrolytic degradation products. The linearity was also evaluated for cephalexin and ampicillin. The conditions selected for MSC separation were compared with those for a HPLC system, and similar results were obtained in terms of chromatographic parameters but a difference in retention times was observed.

Amoxicillin↗