PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9248687

Hemostasis in endodontic microsurgery.

Abstract

There are numerous ways to achieve hemostasis. With the abundance of hemostatic agents available and with the introduction of new products, one has to make an objective decision. A good agent achieves hemostasis within a short period of time, is easy to manipulate, is biocompatible, does not impair or retard healing, must be relatively inexpensive, is reliable, and works best for the particular surgical procedure. With these purposes in mind, the following sequence is recommended to achieve hemostasis during endodontic microsurgery. I. Presurgical: Give 2 to 3 Carpules of 1:50,000 epinephrine local anesthetic with multiple infiltration sites throughout the entire surgical field. II. Surgical: A. Remove all granulation tissue. B. Place an epinephrine pellet into the bony crypt followed by dry sterile cotton pellets. Apply pressure for 2 minutes. Remove all the cotton pellets except the first epinephrine pellet. Continue with the surgical procedure and remove the epinephrine pellet before final irrigation and closure. C. Alternatively, calcium sulfate can be mixed into a thick putty and packed against the bone cavity. Because it is a biodegradable material, calcium sulfate can be left in situ. In fact, in large bone defects and through-and-through lesions, additional calcium sulfate can be placed to fill the entire bone cavity as a barrier material. Healing is more predictable with little chance of scar tissue formation. Calcium sulfate resorbs in 2 to 4 weeks. D. Small bleeding sites in the bone can be brushed with ferric sulfate solution. III. Postsurgical: Tissue compression before and after suturing cuts down on postsurgical bleeding and swelling. Hemostasis is imperative in endodontic microsurgery for better visualization, a good environment for placement of retrograde filling material, and a more efficient surgical procedure with less blood loss.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S Kim, S Rethnam. 1997. Hemostasis in endodontic microsurgery.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9248687/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Canine impactions: incidence and management.

Impacted teeth present many problems for the orthodontist. They can compromise tooth movement, esthetics, and functional outcomes. The second most commonly impacted tooth, after the maxillary third molar, is the maxillary canine, with an incidence from 1% to 2.5%. Maxillary canines can be impacted facially or palatally and are more common in female patients than in male patients. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to address the incidence and etiology associated with impacted maxillary canines, the clinical and radiographic evaluation of the situation, and the techniques for managing this problem. Papers related to this topic were identified and reviewed thoroughly. A decision tree involving the various techniques employed to expose impacted canines is presented, together with methods used to identify the location of impacted canines. The impacted canine can be properly managed with proper diagnosis and technique.

Alveolectomy↗

Lingual flap retraction for third molar removal.

PURPOSE: Lingual nerve damage following lower third molar surgery remains a clinical problem. The traditional approach in the United States has been a buccal approach avoiding exposure or surgery on the lingual side of the crest of the ridge. An alternative technique is to deliberately expose the lingual tissues and retract the lingual nerve lingually before tooth removal. This study reports a trial of this technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients had removal of their lower third molars carried out using a technique that raises a lingual flap in addition to a buccal flap and places a specially designed lingual retractor to ensure that the lingual nerve is held out of the surgical field. This technique was used in cases where the crown of the tooth had to be sectioned or when distal bone needed to be removed. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty patients were treated by this method. There were 4 cases of transient lingual paresthesia, presumably caused by traction pressure from the retractor. Three of these cases were mild and resolved within 3 weeks. The fourth case had more profound paresthesia, but still resolved within 2 months. There were no cases of permanent nerve damage, and in many cases removal of the third molar was simplified by the superior access. CONCLUSION: Lingual retraction for third molar removal improves access to the surgical site and can simplify third molar removal. In this prospective study there were no cases of permanent lingual nerve injury.

Alveolectomy↗

Transurgical restoration in the absence of attached gingiva. A case report.

A 45-year-old woman needing a Class V restoration in a mandibular molar without attached gingiva is presented. In an interdisciplinary intervention, transurgical restoration was accomplished, including flap surgery with a slight ostectomy and restoration with a bonding system and a resin composite. A 1-year clinical evaluation showed satisfactory marginal adaptation and restoration contour associated to gingival tissue health.

Alveolectomy↗