PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9253918

Retained foreign bodies.

C W Kaiser·T Slowick·K P Spurling·S Friedman
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of occurrence and outcome of patients having retained foreign bodies after treatment in an urgent-care setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Closed case records from the files of the Medical Professional Mutual Insurance Company involving claims of retained foreign body were reviewed for a 7-year period. MAIN RESULTS: Thirty-two patients filed 54 claims against 32 physicians and 22 health care institutions. Defense costs were $298,906, and indemnity payments were $1,279,171. Glass was the most frequent retained foreign body, constituting 53% of claims. Despite the fact that glass is radiopaque, x-ray films were ordered for only 35% of these patients. Retention of glass fragments when no radiologic study was obtained resulted in unsuccessful defense of 60% of the claims and higher indemnity payments. Radiologic studies were ordered for only 31% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: All wounds should be considered to be at risk for foreign body entry. Documentation in the medical record of wound exploration and patient follow-up, and ordering of plain films and other diagnostic imaging studies should be used more frequently toward this end.

Explore related subjects

Diagnostic ErrorsForeign BodiesHumansMalpracticeJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C W Kaiser, T Slowick, K P Spurling, S Friedman. 1997. Retained foreign bodies.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199707000-00025

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Prevalence-dependent diagnostic accuracy measures.

We study prevalence-dependent diagnostic accuracy measures, specifically, positive and negative predictive values. These measures permit an assessment of the clinical utility of diagnostic tests across populations with different disease prevalences. In many cases, prevalence may not be known with certainty and the evaluation of the diagnostic tests must account for this uncertainty. A sensitivity analysis may be desired across a prevalence continuum defining low to high-risk populations. For this scenario, simultaneous inference about the predictive values across a range of prevalences is proposed. For situations where a non-point prior distribution on prevalence is specified, we suggest inferences based on averaging the accuracy measures with respect to the prior, leading to simple numerical summaries. The methods are illustrated in a meta-analysis of diagnostic tests for intravascular device-related bloodstream infection, where the prevalence may vary widely both within and across populations.

Diagnostic Errors↗
PubMed2007

Measuring the psychosocial consequences of screening.

The last three decades have seen a dramatic rise in the implementation of screening programmes for cancer in industrialised countries. However, in contrast to screening for infectious diseases, most cancer screening programmes only have the potential to reduce mortality; they cannot lower the incidence of cancer in a population. In fact, most cancer screening programmes have been shown to increase the incidence of the disease as a consequence of over-diagnosis. A further dilemma of cancer screening programmes is that they do not distinguish between healthy people and those with disease. Rather, they identify a continuum of disease severity. Consequently, many healthy people who have abnormal screening tests are wrongly diagnosed. Indeed, studies have demonstrated that for each screening-prevented death from cancer, at least 200 false-positive results are given. Therefore, screening has the potential to be harmful as well as beneficial. The psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening results cannot be determined by diagnostic tests or by other technical means. Instead, patient reported outcome measures must be employed. To measure the outcomes of screening accurately and comprehensively patient reported outcome measures have to capture; the nature and extent of the psychosocial consequences and how these change over time. The outcome measures used must have high content validity and their psychometric properties should be determined prior to their use in the specific population. In particular it is important to establish unidimensionality, additivity and item ordering through the application of Item Response Theory.

Diagnostic Errors↗
PubMed2007

Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI in human herpesvirus-6 encephalitis.

UNLABELLED: We report a patient with human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) encephalitis diagnosed by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). A previously healthy 10-month-old girl developed acute encephalopathy. HHV-6 DNA was detected in her cerebrospinal fluid during the acute phase of the disease by polymerase chain reaction. The patient demonstrated cortical diffusion abnormalities in affected brain parenchyma, partially as the initial or most sensitive sign of encephalitis that could be detected not by conventional MRI but by DW-MRI. Serial imaging showed that the diffusion abnormality DW-MRI returned to normal after 45 days. CONCLUSION: DW-MRI may be a valuable tool for early detection and diagnosis of HHV-6 encephalitis and is more sensitive than conventional MRI to detect a subtle edematous change in the brain.

Diagnostic Errors↗