PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9258206

Urolithiasis in the exstrophy-epispadias complex.

Abstract

PURPOSE: We sought to determine the incidence of urolithiasis in patients with the exstrophy-epispadias complex, associated risk factors and guidelines for the proper clinical management of this problem. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the chart and x-rays of 530 patients with the exstrophy-epispadias complex treated at our institution. RESULTS: Stones formed in 77 of the 530 patients (15%), including 16% of those with classic exstrophy, 25% of those with cloacal exstrophy and 3% of those with epispadias. White and male individuals were most commonly affected. Most calculi formed in the bladder, whether native or augmented by enterocystoplasty. Standard techniques were successful for stone removal. Most calculi consisted of calcium apatite, calcium oxalate monohydrate or magnesium ammonium phosphate, usually in combination with at least 1 other element. The risk of stone formation was associated with augmentation cystoplasty (p < 0.001) and a bladder neck procedure to increase outlet resistance (p < 0.001). Other risk factors included urinary tract infection, foreign bodies, vesicoureteral reflux and urinary stasis but not acidosis or immobilization. Stones recurred in 30 patients (39%), including equal numbers of those treated with open and closed techniques, and recurrence was associated with urinary tract infection or struvite composition (p < 0.05). Serum calcium abnormalities were not present in any patient, including those with metabolic acidosis or prolonged immobilization. Urinary chemistry studies were incomplete or unavailable. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that urolithiasis in the exstrophy-epispadias complex is related to risk factors associated with surgical reconstruction of this condition. The role of metabolic abnormalities that may predispose to urolithiasis is unknown but under investigation. Standard treatment is effective but stone recurrence remains a significant problem. Urine chemistry data may provide information to help minimize stone development in this patient population.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R I Silver, D A Gros, R D Jeffs, J P Gearhart. 1997. Urolithiasis in the exstrophy-epispadias complex.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199709000-00175

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

De novo proximal duplication of 1(q12q22) in a female infant with multiple congenital anomalies.

Reports of small proximal 1q duplications are rare. We report a 1 month-old female who was referred to clinic because she was believed to have features suggestive of Turner syndrome. The patient's dysmorphic features included a prominent nose, low-set and crumpled ears, slightly high palate, short neck, high-pitched cry, mild micrognathia, hypoplastic labia majora, and somewhat deep palmar creases. Traditional G-band chromosome studies of the patient were interpreted as 46,XX,dup(1)(q12q21). To further evaluate the extent of the chromosome 1 duplication, Spectral Karyotyping and a series of six fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) probes were utilized. The FISH probes refined the extent of the duplication to involve the region 1(q12q22) indicating the duplicated segment was larger than interpreted by the G-banding studies. This first case of non-mosaic proximal duplication of 1q to be characterized by multiple locus specific FISH probes should allow a more refined delineation of the phenotypic findings and clinical significance associated with this rare chromosomal duplication.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗

Long-term follow-up of a 26-year-old male with duplication of 16p: clinical report and review.

We report on a 26-year-old male with profound psychomotor retardation and a pattern of dysmorphic features and malformations characteristic for duplication of the short arm of chromosome 16. He has an elongated face, sparse hair, upslanting palpebral fissures, anteverted nostrils, hypoplastic thumbs on both hands, and dislocation of several joints. His chromosome aberration was diagnosed at birth and was due to an unbalanced segregation of a maternal translocation t(2;16)(q36;p11). At 26 years of age he is, to the best of our knowledge, the oldest patient with duplication of 16p reported to date. We present a long-term observation of growth, psychomotor development, dysmorphic features and evolution of his skeletal and joint defects as well as a review of the literature.

Abnormalities, Multiple↗