PubMed · 9260323
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J Devière. Which future for ERCP?. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9260323/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
We report an unusual case of a ruptured primary hydatid cyst of the gallbladder. The sonographic appearance-a distended gallbladder containing an intraluminal mass with undulating membranes in the neck and body-led to the diagnosis of this extremely rare condition.
Surgeons today have a wide range of therapeutic options for the management of patients with choledocholithiasis. Endoscopists, interventional radiologists, and surgeons employ a variety of techniques to access and remove common bile duct stones (CBDS) successfully. Although earlier studies have been done to assess the relative merits of laparoscopic and endoscopic management of CBDS, few of them have employed a randomized prospective trial for the comparison. Without recognized parameters for comparison, no definitive conclusions can be drawn. Herein, we examine the role of therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as an important adjunct to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in the management of CBDS. The three main scenarios in which this modality is employed for CBDS removal are selective preoperative ERCP, intraoperative ERCP, and postoperative ERCP. We conclude that an appropriate balance must be struck to maintain a high yield of positive or therapeutic ERCP, avoid unnecessary ERCP, and not miss CBDS, while ensuring acceptably low rates of morbidity and mortality and controlling costs. As we await the publication of prospective data, we may look for direction from decision analysis in order to develop optimal management strategies and define the "best practice" results that should be expected of operators before new procedures and innovative technology are accepted on a widespread basis.
BACKGROUND: Symptomatic or complicated gallstone disease is the most common reason for nongynecological operations during pregnancy. Gallstones are present in 12% of all pregnancies, and more than one-third of patients fail medical treatment and therefore require surgical endoscopy or laparoscopy. Gallstone pancreatitis and jaundice during pregnancy is associated with a high recurrence rate, exposing both fetus and mother to an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. METHODS: During a 4-year period, all pregnant patients (n = 37) with symptomatic or complicated gallstone disease were studied prospectively at the Landeskrankenhaus in Salzburg, Austria. Five patients had an endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram (ERCP) for biliary pancreatitis or jaundice; two of these underwent subsequent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Another seven patients required laparoscopic cholecystectomy for severe pain or cholecystitis; all were in their 13th-32nd gestational week. Access was established by Veress needle in all cases. Insufflation pressure was 8-10 mm Hg, and mean operative time was 62 min. RESULTS: All patients delivered full-term, healthy babies. There were no postendoscopic or postoperative complications. All patients enjoyed full relief from their symptoms; there were no recurrences of pancreatitis or jaundice. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of ERCP and laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers a safe and effective option for the definitive treatment of complicated gallstone disease and intractable pain during pregnancy, and there is sufficient access for the combined treatment to be employed.