PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9261705

A burn center cost-reduction program.

J J Mathews·K Supple·A Calistro·R L Gamelli
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

A concerted effort to decrease resource usage and length of stay without sacrificing quality of care was undertaken over a 2-year period in a high-census Burn Center. Through a series of changes in practice, substantial decreases in the costs of several high-usage items were tracked. During this period the average length of stay also was decreased. The average hospital charge decreased from $46,628 per patient in fiscal year 1993 to $33,159 per patient in fiscal year 1994. During this period there was no significant change in the patient population as measured by total body surface area percentage burn and acuity level. With the exception of significant improvement in the infection rate, there was no substantial change in indicators of quality care as measured by readmission, morbidity, and posthospital would healing progression. This cost-reduction program showed that costs can be reduced without diminishing quality of care; in some respects quality of care improved due to the practice changes that were implemented.

Explore related subjects

Burn UnitsBurnsCost ControlCost SavingsHospital CostsHospitals, TeachingHumansIllinoisLength of StayPatient Care PlanningQuality Assurance, Health CareWound HealingJournal Article

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J J Mathews, K Supple, A Calistro, R L Gamelli. A burn center cost-reduction program.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004630-199707000-00016

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2001

A European hospital survey to determine the extent of psychological services offered to patients with severe burns.

Analogous to a hospital survey in North America (the US and Canada) a survey in Europe was performed to determine the extent of psychological services offered in burn units. The questionnaire used to acquire this information was exactly the same in both continents. One hundred and seventy questionnaires and self-addressed stamped envelopes were sent to the medical manager of the European burn units with the request to pass the questionnaire to the person who provides psychological care to patients in the burn units. The questionnaire was translated into four other languages. Response was 103 (62.8%). The questions posed inquired after what percentage of patients received psychological testing, psychological therapy, displayed symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress, what percentage is given referral and if emotional follow-up is arranged. Also questions about whether staff members of the burn unit displayed symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress were enclosed. Results indicated that few burn units in Europe provide formal psychological testing for their patients and in half of the European hospitals, less than 20% of the patients receive psychological therapy or counselling during their stay in the hospital. Aftercare services are also capable of improvement. Compared with North America, Europe provided less psychological services. No statistical differences were found between countries within Europe.

Burn Units↗
PubMed2001

Measuring and improving patients' and families' perceptions of care in a system of pediatric hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Shriners Hospitals for Children (SHC) is a network of 22 pediatric specialty hospitals that provide medical care free of charge to children up to 18 years of age and that serve as referral centers for children with complex orthopedic and burn problems. In 1998 the SHC system began using The Picker Institute's Patient and Family Perception of Care inpatient survey throughout its hospitals. SYSTEMWIDE IMPLEMENTATION: A broad-based implementation plan was developed to promote acceptance of the perception of care topic and provide education on performance improvement. In 1999 a work group was formed to prioritize areas for improvement, survey benchmark hospitals, and identify best practices in benchmark hospitals. This work group first focused on the dimensions of Partnership Between Families and Clinicians and Information and Education to the Child. In May 1999 the work group began the task of identifying best practices in these two priority dimensions from the SHC benchmark hospitals. Surveys were submitted to those hospitals, asking what they perceived as being the reasons they scored well in those areas. The results of these surveys were used to identify key practices in these benchmark hospitals that are of significant importance in patient and family perceptions of quality care. NEXT STEPS: The challenge is to facilitate cross-facility interactions to understand and adopt best practices. Focus groups will be conducted to further delineate the dimensions with higher problem scores. The SHC system plans to expand the patient surveys to outpatients, to allow for the evaluation of the full complement of hospital patients.

Burn Units↗