PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9263382

A limited sampling approach in bioequivalence studies.

Abstract

A limited sampling model (LSM) has been developed for an antidepressant immediate-release product (Drug A) and an antiepileptic controlled release product (Drug B) to predict the area under the curve (AUC) and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and to compare the bioequivalence of two formulations of each drug using predicted versus observed AUC and Cmax after a single oral dose. The LSM for drug A was developed using data from 10 healthy people. The correlation between plasma concentration (independent variable) at selected time points with the AUC or Cmax (dependent variable) was evaluated by simple regression analysis. The linear regression that gave the best correlation coefficient (r) for a single sampling time versus AUC or Cmax was chosen as the LSM. The model provided good estimates of AUC and Cmax for drug A. The 90% confidence interval on log transformed observed and predicted AUC and Cmax were as follows: AUC observed = 100% to 118%, AUC predicted = 101% to 117%, Cmax observed = 99% to 125%, and Cmax predicted = 100% to 131%. The LSM for drug B was developed using a similar approach to drug A. The 90% confidence interval on log transformed observed and predicted AUC and Cmax were: AUC observed = 99% to 110%, AUC predicted = 99% to 118%, Cmax observed = 107% to 120%, and Cmax predicted = 99% to 111%. Although the predicted Cmax did not meet the 90% confidence interval for drug A, the method described here may be used to estimate AUC and Cmax for a drug in bioequivalence studies without detailed blood sampling. More research is needed in this direction.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

I Mahmood, N Chamberlin, V Tammara. 1997. A limited sampling approach in bioequivalence studies.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007691-199708000-00009

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A double-blind placebo-controlled trial of zonisamide (zonegran) in the treatment of essential tremor.

Medical therapy for essential tremor (ET), a common movement disorder, is often inadequate. We performed a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of zonisamide (ZNS), an antiepileptic agent, in treating ET. Twenty patients (mean age, 60 +/- 15 years) with ET were randomized to receive ZNS or placebo. ZNS was initiated at a dosage of 100 mg/day and escalated to 200 mg/day at day 14. Patients were evaluated by accelerometry and the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) rating scale at baseline and days 14 and 28, as well as the Clinical Global Impression (CGI-C) scale at day 28. At endpoint, subjects assigned to ZNS were taking a mean dosage of 160 +/- 50 mg/day. There were no significant improvements in the FTM total score or its subsections. Tremor amplitude as assessed by accelerometry significantly improved in the ZNS group compared to the placebo group at endpoint relative to baseline (-0.50 +/- 0.72 vs. 0.30 +/- 0.79 m/s(2); P = 0.03). On the CGI-C, 60% (n = 6) of patients in the ZNS group felt that their tremor was unchanged, while the remaining patients felt that their tremor was "minimally improved." Thirty percent (n = 3) of patients taking ZNS discontinued the study due to side effects (fatigue, headache, paresthesias) while taking 100 mg per day. ZNS did not provide significant improvements in clinical rating scales at study endpoint compared to placebo and was only modestly well tolerated. ZNS was effective in reducing tremor amplitude as measured by accelerometry.

Anticonvulsants↗