PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9269491

Setting dissolution specifications for modified-release dosage forms.

Abstract

Dissolution specifications are used for quality assurance and may also serve as a surrogate for in vivo bioavailability. These limits can guide formulation development and eliminate the need for bioavailability studies for scale up and post approval changes. Several methods for setting dissolution specifications have been reviewed in this chapter. A summary of the advantages and disadvantages for each method can be found in Table 1. When choosing a method for setting dissolution specifications, it is important to 1) have a discriminating dissolution system, 2) incorporate in vivo data, 3) include intersubject variability, and 4) predict plasma concentration-time profiles. Predicting plasma concentration curves allows one to see how the change in formulation or dissolution limits perform in vivo. Dissolution specifications should be set so that all formulations that have dissolution profiles within the limits of the specifications are bioequivalent. This can be assured if the boundaries are tested for bioequivalence. Minimally, the formulations that have dissolution profiles within the limits of the specifications should be bioequivalent to the pivotal batch. A population prediction of the plasma concentration-time profiles for the upper and lower limit would incorporate the true intersubject variability for the formulation.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D A Piscitelli, D Young. 1997. Setting dissolution specifications for modified-release dosage forms.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6036-0_13

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Determination of mineral content of active dry yeast used in pharmaceutical formulations.

The efficiency of seven common methods of digestion of active dry yeast (ADY), which is used in anticariogenic dental formulations, was evaluated for the analytical determination of Fe, Zn, Ca, Mg, Na and K. Four wet-acid digestion and three dry ashing methods are compared in consideration of their estimated reproducibility and metal concentrations obtained. HNO(3), HNO(3)+HCl, HNO(3)+H(2)SO(4) and HNO(3)+HClO(4) were applied for wet digestion of the samples in medium temperatures, while dry ashing at higher temperature with Mg(NO(3))(2) or SrCl(2) as ashing aid agents, were the alternative methods. The final solutions were subsequently analyzed for Fe, Zn, Ca and Mg by flame atomic absorption spectroscopy (FAAS) and for Na and K by atomic emission spectroscopy (AES). Two multivariate statistical methodologies, Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal-Wallis test were applied for the interpretation of the results. Seven additional statistical tests (least-significant difference, Bonferoni, Duncan multiple range, Student-Newman-Keuls, Tuckey significant difference, Tuckey b and Scheffe) were used and proved useful to estimate which of the decomposition methods are outliers. The ideographic approach enabled the comparison of the methods in terms of complexity and difficulty of their steps. Zn and Mg could be reliably determined by any one of the tested methods, while for the other elements, the most powerful method was found and the obtained recoveries were found (>95%).

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗