PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9276101

Developmental changes in tympanometry: a case study.

Abstract

The use of 226 Hz tympanometry in neonates and infants has been controversial due to the large number of false negative responses for middle ear pathology. A review of the literature highlights several anatomical differences between this population and that of the adult, which is not recognized during interpretation of their tympanograms. The aim of the study was to document tympanometric changes in a single child using 226 Hz, 1000 Hz and sweep frequency probe tones until she was 6.5 months old. Both 226 Hz and 1000 Hz tympanograms show a maturational change in middle ear resonance from a mass to a stiffness-dominated system, which was corroborated by sweep frequency probe tones. It is suggested that high-frequency probe tones were able to increase test sensitivity to the mechanics of the middle ear when it was mass-dominated, as in this infant. Due to the large intersubject variability reported in the literature, it is recommended that both high and conventional probe tone tympanograms are performed in infants under 6 months of age to increase diagnostic accuracy. Middle ear resonance can also be determined for each individual enabling more appropriate selection of probe tones for Y, B and G tympanometry.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S E Meyer, C A Jardine, W Deverson. 1997. Developmental changes in tympanometry: a case study.. https://doi.org/10.3109/03005364000000021

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Tympanometry].

A flat tympanogram predicts a middle ear effusion in about 90% of cases. This paper describes how to perform tympanometry, some common problems when doing it and how to classify the curves in normal (type A), middle ear effusion (type B) or negative pressure (type C). The theoretical background of impedance audiometry is outlined. The stapedius reflex, pneumatic otoscopy, reflexometry and otomicroscopy are described as supplements or alternatives in diagnosing fluid in the middle ear. Tympanometry is recommended as a diagnostic modality for general practitioners.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

[Investigations and diagnosis of deafness].

Otoscopic examination and audiometric tests complement each other for the diagnosis of hearing loss. Objective tests measure the hearing loss at some specific frequencies. Endo- or retrocochlear origin of the deafness is identified thanks to these tests, leading to selection of the most appropriate therapeutic option. In children, behavioral assessment techniques are to be adapted to the patient's age. Information from tympanometry, otoacoustic emissions and possibly auditory brainstem responses, is used to complete the diagnosis. Language skills are also assessed in order to adapt the child's deafness management to his/her actual communication ability.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

[Standardized measurement of sound transmission of different middle ear prostheses].

The sound transmission properties of three different commercially available middle ear implants and the prototype of a complete middle ear prosthesis (CoMEP) were evaluated with a special measurement system that permits standardized conditions. This system uses a mechanical middle ear model (MMM) which approximates the impedances of the tympanic membrane and inner ear. The implants were fitted under defined conditions into the MMM. Displacement of the artificial stapes footplate of the MMM was measured with an optical probe. The measurements of different middle ear prostheses showed that the mass of the implant was the most important factor for optimum high frequency transmission. The lightest implant (4 mg, titanium) showed the best results. The CoMEP revealed the highest sensitivity because of a slight enlargement of the diameter of the artificial tympanic membrane. These findings show that the CoMEP is able to restore sound transmission to a normal range. In a second experiment one of the implants was fitted into the MMM with different forces. The increase of stiffness produced a slightly better high frequency transmission at the expense of low frequency sensitivity. Hence, the fitting of the implant may not be too stiff because of its loss of mobility within a significant frequency range.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗