PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9282223

Glass patterns: some contrast effects re-evaluated.

Abstract

The relative contrast of features is known to be important in determining if they can be grouped. Two manipulations of feature contrast have previously been used to criticise models of visual grouping based on spatial filtering: high-pass filtering and reversal of contrast polarity. The effects of these manipulations are considered in the context of the perception of Glass patterns. It is shown that high-pass filtering elements, whilst destroying structure in the output of low-pass filters, do not significantly disrupt the output of locally band-pass filters. The finding that subjects can perceive structure in Glass patterns composed of high-pass features therefore offers no evidence against such spatial filtering mechanisms. Band-pass filtering models are shown to explain the rotation of perceived structure in Glass patterns composed of opposite contrast features. However, structure is correctly perceived in patterns composed of two 'interleaved' opposite contrast patterns, which is problematic for oriented filtering mechanisms. Two possible explanations are considered: nonlinear contrast transduction prior to filtering, and integration of local orientation estimates from first-order and second-order mechanisms.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

S C Dakin. 1997. Glass patterns: some contrast effects re-evaluated.. https://doi.org/10.1068/p260253

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Dark field transmission electron microscope images of III-V quantum dot structures.

Multi-layer quantum dot structures are becoming increasingly common in order to improve the efficiency of quantum dot lasers. Each layer of dots may be influenced by the preceding dot layer, and the dot density can vary from layer to layer. Characterization of such structures relies on the reliable determination of the shape, size and density of dots in each layer. Dark field transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images using the 002 diffraction condition are frequently used, viewing the layers edge-on in a cross-section sample. A simple model is used to describe the contrast as a function of dot size and shape, specimen thickness, and the composition of the dot and surrounding materials. Good agreement with experimental results is obtained. It is found that the dot size is not accurately related to the bright region seen in such images. While 002 images can be used to determine the size and shape of dots, a density per unit area cannot be calculated in the cross section geometry without either measuring--or assuming--the specimen thickness. In multilayer structures, plan-view TEM images show the layers as overlapping, losing the information from individual layers. By tilting a cross-section specimen to allow imaging with the dark field 113 diffraction condition, the density in individual layers can be measured. Additional information, such as wetting layer thickness variations and alignment of dots due to surface roughness or substrate offcut, can also be obtained.

Contrast Sensitivity↗

Contrast and resolution enhancement of a near-field optical microscope by using a modulation technique.

A new design of a tunneling near-field optical microscope (TNOM) combined with an atomic force microscope (AFM) is presented. This design can be used to generate three different images of the sample's surface: a non-contact (tapping mode) AFM image, a conventional TNOM and an image of a modulation signal of the conventional TNOM, which we call AC-TNOM. The images are obtained simultaneously, using a single light source. It is shown that the AC-TNOM has better resolution ( approximately 200A) and contrast compared to conventional TNOM ( approximately 400A).

Contrast Sensitivity↗

Is depth perception of stereo plaids predicted by intersection of constraints, vector average or second-order feature?

Stereo plaid stimuli were created to investigate whether depth perception is determined by an intersection of constraints (IOC) or vector average (VA) operation on the Fourier components, or by the second-order (non-Fourier) feature in a pattern. We first created stereo plaid stimuli where IOC predicted vertical disparity, VA predicted positive diagonal disparity and the second-order feature predicted negative diagonal disparity. In a depth discrimination task, observers indicated whether they perceived the pattern as 'near' or 'far' relative to a zero-disparity aperture. Observers' perception was consistent with the disparity predicted by VA, indicating its dominance over IOC and the second-order feature in this condition. Additional stimuli in which VA predicted vertical disparity were created to investigate whether VA would dominate perception when it was a less reliable cue. In this case, observers' performance was consistent with disparity predicted by IOC or the second-order feature, not VA. Finally, in order to determine whether the second-order feature contributes to depth perception, stimuli were created where IOC and VA predicted positive horizontal disparity while the second-order feature predicted negative horizontal disparity. When the component gratings were oriented near horizontal (+/-83 degrees from vertical), depth perception corresponded to that predicted by the second-order feature. However, as the components moved away from horizontal (+/-75 degrees and +/-65 degrees from vertical), depth perception was increasingly likely to be predicted by an IOC or VA operation. These experiments suggest that the visual system does not rely exclusively on a single method for computing pattern disparity. Instead, it favours the most reliable method for a given condition.

Contrast Sensitivity↗