PubMed · 9287901
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
W F Young. 1997. Informed consent.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70175-6
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the degree of suspicion of pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department (ED). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the cases of patients with TEP diagnosed during two years and compared group A (PE suspected) with group B (PE was not initially suspected). RESULTS: 57 cases of PE were admitted from ED. In 14 (25%) of them the PE was not suspected. There were statistically significant differences in the signs of deep venous thrombosis (more prevalent in group A), heart failure, and pleural effusion (more frequent in group B). The alternative diagnosis were mostly heart failure and pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: The patients with unsuspected PE do not have a different clinical profile. The PE is most of the times confused with heart failure and pneumonia.