PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9303233

Closed and restricted practices.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of recently certificated Ontario family physicians who have closed their practices to new patients or restricted their services. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey mailed between September 1993 and January 1994. SETTING: Ontario family practices. PARTICIPANTS: All family medicine residency-trained certificants of the College of Family Physicians of Canada from 1989 to 1991 currently practising in Ontario. Response rate was 70% (395 of 564 eligible physicians). Otherwise eligible physicians practising as locums, emergency room physicians, or military physicians were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Self-report of practices being closed to new patients and of various restrictions placed on practices. RESULTS: Nearly one third of respondents had closed their practices to new patients. Although the decision to close a practice correlated with length of time in practice, physicians in metropolitan Toronto were significantly less likely to report closed practices than physicians practising in other regions of Ontario. Restrictions reported related to patients and problems, geographic area, and type of setting(s) serviced. About 45% of respondents did not provide one or more of a defined set of five services. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study suggest that family physicians restrict their practices in various ways within the first 5 years after certification.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C A Woodward, A P Williams, M Cohen, B Ferrier. 1997. Closed and restricted practices.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9303233/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Assessing the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system: digital vs plaster dental casts.

INTRODUCTION: The purposes of this study were to determine whether the American Board of Orthodontics objective grading system (ABO OGS) can be assessed accurately from digital dental casts and whether there are statistical differences between digital and plaster dental casts in scoring the ABO OGS. METHODS: Thirty posttreatment plaster dental casts were selected and scanned by OrthoCAD (Cadent, Carlstadt, NJ) to produce 30 corresponding digital dental casts. The plaster and digital casts were compared by using the criteria of the ABO OGS. Because the data were ordinal, a nonparametic statistical analysis was used. RESULTS: The Wilcoxon test for paired samples showed significant differences between the plaster and digital casts for occlusal contacts, occlusal relationships, and total scores (P <.05). No significant differences were found for alignment, marginal ridges, overjet, and interproximal contacts. Buccolingual inclination was not included in this study because of inability to perform proper measurements with the OrthoCAD program. Mean differences of points deducted ranged from .03 point for marginal ridges to 5.07 points for the total score. The variable with the most points deducted related to occlusal relationships, and the fewest points were deducted for interproximal contacts. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study, the current OrthoCAD program (version 2.2) was not adequate for scoring all parameters as required by the ABO OGS.

Certification↗