PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9305113

Benchmarking and clinical pathway implementation on a multihospital basis.

Abstract

Hospital utilization data for communities with high levels of managed care penetration can be readily used to develop utilization benchmarks in any proactive efforts to prepare for oncoming prospective pricing system (PPS) initiatives. In a cooperative effort among all four Syracuse, NY hospitals, the combined average hospital LOS for one surgical and three medical DRGs was compared with benchmarks derived from similar populations in three heavily managed care-penetrated west coast communities. Implementation of clinical or critical paths are a widely accepted approach to shortening hospital lengths of stay and improving both resource usage and clinical outcomes. After implementing clinical paths across all four institutions and revisiting their data a year later, a fairly dramatic reduction (28%) in mean LOS for total hip replacement procedures was achieved. Two of the three medical DRGs, stroke and acute MI, each showed a mean reduction of 17% in LOS.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R J Lagoe, D L Aspling. Benchmarking and clinical pathway implementation on a multihospital basis.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9305113/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Clinical management. Design for living.

91 per cent of patients started treatment within two mounths of referral, compared to 70-80 per cent last year. The last five months has seen rapid progress at a rate of 2 per cent a month. Sustaining improvement depends on leadership, measurement and looking at the whole patient pathway.

Critical Pathways↗

[Clinical pathways -- first results of a systematic IT-supported application at a surgical department of a university hospital].

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In analogy to industrial process management, clinical pathways have been introduced for operational process organisation in orthopedic and interventional procedures as well as for conservative treatments. Within this study, introduction and continuous, systematic application of clinical pathways at a surgical department of a university hospital was investigated. METHODS: Analysis was performed by IT-based (SAP/i. s. h.med) evaluation of the registered data regarding pathway violations. Additionally, patients' records were matched with the computerized data for quality assurance of pathway documentation. RESULTS: 501 patients were entered in 16 clinical pathways (31 +/- 39 patients per pathway). The mean period from the introduction of a distinct pathway to the data acquisition of the present study ranged from 2 to 14 months (mean 7+/-7.5 months). Pathway violations correlated with the complexity, but not with the period since the pathway was introduced. Organisational reasons next to medical reasons (i. e. delayed gastric function or wound healing) were the most frequent causes for pathway violations. CONCLUSION: Clinical pathways may not only be realised for operative procedures or conservative treatments, but represent a clinical and administrative management instrument at a surgical department of a university hospital for daily work routine. They are suitable as an instrument for clinical quality and risk management, as an economic control instrument in reorganisation phases as well as in the routine of surgical clinics.

Critical Pathways↗