PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9306529

A noninvasive, three-dimensional spinal motion analysis method.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A three-dimensional, noninvasive motion analysis method was developed by monitoring the orientation of the principal axes of each vertebra. OBJECTIVES: To develop a method of performing three-dimensional, noninvasive motion analysis of the spine using computed tomography data. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The concept of using principal axes of the moment of inertia tensor to measure the orientation and position of a rigid body has been applied to the wrist and subtalar joints, but has not yet been applied to the spine. METHODS: Scans were taken of two isolated vertebrae in various known positions. Centroids, area, moments, and product of inertia of each scan were determined using a commercial program. Custom software combined data using the parallel axis theorem to give three-dimensional data for each vertebra. Changes in the centroid and principal axes were used to calculate translation and rotation, respectively. RESULTS: The system accuracy was within 1.0 degree in rotation and 1.0 mm in translation. Some errors occurred in minor motions when a smaller number of scans were used. System resolution was 0.43 mm. CONCLUSIONS: A system has been developed capable of calculating three-dimensional spinal motion based on measurements of a series of computed tomography images. The system has an accuracy similar to that of current motion analysis methods, but future studies will be necessary to apply this system in vivo.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

T H Lim, J C Eck, H S An, L M McGrady, G F Harris, V M Haughton. 1997-09-01. A noninvasive, three-dimensional spinal motion analysis method.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199709010-00011

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Load-carrying capacity of the human cervical spine in compression is increased under a follower load.

STUDY DESIGN: An experimental approach was used to test human cadaveric cervical spine specimens. OBJECTIVE: To assess the response of the cervical spine to a compressive follower load applied along a path that approximates the tangent to the curve of the cervical spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The compressive load on the human cervical spine is estimated to range from 120 to 1200 N during activities of daily living. Ex vivo experiments show it buckles at approximately 10 N. Differences between the estimated in vivo loads and the ex vivo load-carrying capacity have not been satisfactorily explained. METHODS: A new experimental technique was developed for applying a compressive follower load of physiologic magnitudes up to 250 N. The experimental technique applied loads that minimized the internal shear forces and bending moments, loading the specimen in nearly pure compression. RESULTS: A compressive vertical load applied in the neutral and forward-flexed postures caused large changes in cervical lordosis at small load magnitudes. The specimen collapsed in extension or flexion at a load of less than 40 N. In sharp contrast, the cervical spine supported a load of up to 250 N without damage or instability in both the sagittal and frontal planes when the load path was tangential to the spinal curve. The cervical spine was significantly less flexible under a compressive follower load compared with the hypermobility demonstrated under a compressive vertical load (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The load-carrying capacity of the ligamentous cervical spine sharply increased under a compressive follower load. This experiment explains how a whole cervical spine can be lordotic and yet withstand the large compressive loads estimated in vivo without damage or instability.

Cadaver↗

The cervical facet capsule and its role in whiplash injury: a biomechanical investigation.

STUDY DESIGN: Cervical facet capsular strains were determined during bending and at failure in the human cadaver. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of an axial pretorque on facet capsular strains and estimate the risk for subcatastrophic capsular injury during normal bending motions. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Epidemiologic and clinical studies have identified the facet capsule as a potential site of injury and prerotation as a risk factor for whiplash injury. Unfortunately, biomechanical data on the cervical facet capsule and its role in whiplash injury are not available. METHODS: Cervical spine motion segments were tested in a pure-moment test frame and the full-field strains determined throughout the facet capsule. Motion segments were tested with and without a pretorque in pure bending. The isolated facet was then elongated to failure. Maximum principal strains during bending were compared with failure strains, by paired t test. RESULTS: Statistically significant increases in principal capsular strains during flexion-extension loading were observed when a pretorque was applied. All measured strains during bending were significantly less than strains at catastrophic joint failure. The same was true for subcatastrophic ligament failure strains, except in the presence of a pretorque. CONCLUSIONS: Pretorque of the head and neck increases facet capsular strains, supporting its role in the whiplash mechanism. Although the facet capsule does not appear to be at risk for gross injury during normal bending motions, a small portion of the population may be at risk for subcatastrophic injury.

Cadaver↗