PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9321738

Are calcium antagonists proarrhythmic?

Abstract

Clinical and experimental studies demonstrate that calcium (Ca2+) overload in myocardial cells is an important factor in the genesis of various serious arrhythmias. Calcium antagonists block voltage-dependent channels and thus reduce entry of Ca2+ into heart cells. Because of their specificity for atrioventricular nodal cells, verapamil and diltiazem are used clinically to treat supraventricular arrhythmias involving transmission in the atrioventricular node. These two drugs and the dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium antagonists have been shown to prevent ventricular ischemic and reperfusion arrhythmias in the laboratory. Despite these data indicating that calcium antagonists are antiarrhythmic, a recent controversy has raised the possibility that certain calcium antagonists are unsafe to use, especially for patients with coronary heart disease. Proarrhythmia has been proposed to be a mechanism contributing to potentially adverse outcomes. Although excessive concentrations of verapamil and diltiazem may cause sino-atrial nodal asystole and varying degrees of atrioventricular block, there is little direct evidence that this contributes to significant proarrhythmia, for example, ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Nonetheless, although it appears paradoxical that agents which block the entry of Ca2+ into heart cells may be considered arrhythmogenic, there are circumstances under which dosage with certain calcium antagonists potentially leads to myocardial Ca2+ overload. For example, bouts of neurohormonal activation brought about by calcium antagonist-induced abrupt reductions in blood pressure may be accompanied each time by significant beta-adrenergic-enhanced influx of Ca2+ through the L-type cardiac calcium channels. This elevates the intracellular Ca2+ concentration and disturbs Ca2+ regulation, especially in diseased hearts whose intracellular Ca2+ regulation has already been compromised, and might induce alterations in cardiac electrical activity. In the present article, interactions among cardiac calcium channels, classes of calcium antagonists, and specific formulations of certain antagonists are considered with respect to directly induced ventricular arrhythmogenesis. Indirect potentially proarrhythmic actions of the calcium antagonists are also discussed. We outline some of the many questions that remain to be answered with respect to the actions of DHP on the heart including that of whether beta-adrenergic stimulation modifies the degree of cardiac Ca2+ channel inhibition by DHP-type calcium antagonists.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A L Bassett, S Chakko, M Epstein. 1997. Are calcium antagonists proarrhythmic?. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199715090-00001

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Safety of nerve conduction studies in patients with implanted cardiac devices.

Patients with implanted cardiac devices and their physicians may defer important electrodiagnostic testing because of anxiety about potential negative effects on the device. To determine the safety of routine nerve conduction studies (NCS) in this population, 10 patients with permanent dual-chamber pacemakers of various types and five patients with implanted cardiac defibrillators (ICD) underwent nerve stimulation at sites commonly used during NCS. The implanted cardiac device was interrogated before and after the study and there was continuous monitoring of the surface electrocardiogram (ECG) and atrial and ventricular electrograms. Electrical impulses generated during routine NCS were never detected by the sensing amplifier and did not affect the programmed settings of the implanted cardiac device. We conclude that routine NCS is safe in patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers with bipolar sensing configurations and defibrillators.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗

[Pulmonary diseases and heart function].

The most severe cardiac sequel to lung disease is the load on the right ventricle due to pulmonary hypertension with the development of a cor pulmonale. This is characterized by hypertrophy and/or dilatation of the right ventricle because of a primary impairment of lung function and/or lung structure. The most important pathomechanisms for the development of pulmonary hypertension are vessel obliteration, mechanical lesions, primary vascular or extra-vascular inflammation and hypoxic vasoconstriction. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most important reasons for chronic cor pulmonale. A further very common reason is obstructive sleep apnea syndrome, especially if combined with a COPD. In this case, the prevalence of cor pulmonale can reach 80%. The development of a chronic cor pulmonale is the most striking negative prognostic factor for these patients. Only 30% of COPD patients with cor pulmonale survive longer than 5 years, and only early detection of the disturbances to respiration which might potentially lead to cor pulmonale and their subsequent therapy are able to improve the patient's prognosis. Furthermore, pulmonary diseases may also have an impact on the left heart side in terms of an impairment of left heart function or by inducing severe arrhythmias . Thus, lung diseases may have both a significant impact on right and left heart performance.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗