PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9324864

[Implantable bone conduction hearing aids].

Abstract

Conventional extern bone conduction hearing aids often cause retroauricular pain by compression of the skin, distortion is enhanced by the vibrational pattern and feedback can be a problem and, last but not least, do not fit into cosmetic schemes. We report about experiences with 2 different systems of partly implantable bone conduction hearing aids which were designed to overcome the technical, audiological and cosmetical problems of conventional bone conduction hearing aids. There is a transcutaneous and a percutaneous system discussed. Clinical experiences demonstrate that the percutaneous system is superior in both objective hearing gain and patient acceptance.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

R G Matschke. 1997. [Implantable bone conduction hearing aids].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9324864/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

A miniaturized artificial mastoid using a skull simulator.

A miniaturized artificial mastoid of size and weight that allow calibration and measurement of bone conduction hearing aids in a conventional audiometric soundproof box has been developed. Its level of mechanical impedance corresponds to the standard IEC 373 (1990) within the frequency range 250 Hz to 8 kHz. The miniaturized artificial mastoid consists of three parts: coupler, skull simulator (TU-1000), and an external electrical correction filter. The coupler is a highly damped mass-spring system designed to give the miniaturized artificial mastoid mechanical impedance in accordance with the standard IEC 373 (1990). It was found that the miniaturized artificial mastoid yielded results that are in correspondence with results obtained with the Brüel & Kjaer type 4930 artificial mastoid for frequencies above 450 Hz. Thus, at these frequencies, the miniaturized artificial mastoid can be used for audiometer calibration as well as measurement of bone conduction hearing aids.

Bone Conduction

Ossiculoplasty with an intact stapes: superstructure versus footplate prosthesis placement.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Many techniques and prostheses are used for ossiculoplasty in the various situations of ossicular chain status that the surgeon may encounter in tympanoplasty procedures. The current study seeks to determine whether any particular technique or prosthesis used by the author demonstrates superior hearing results with fewer failures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: This study retrospectively reviews a consecutive series of cases with intact stapes superstructures, with an intact malleus handle (Austin-Kartush group A) and without (Austin-Kartush group C). The ossiculoplasties were performed with either partial prosthesis techniques from the stapes superstructure to the drum, malleus, or malleus/drum (as is traditionally reported by most authors) or with less frequently advocated total prosthesis techniques from the stapes footplate to the drum, malleus, or malleus/drum. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Of cases for which 1-year postoperative air and bone hearing results were available, group A cases had significantly smaller air-bone gaps than group C cases. There was no difference in mean air-bone gaps between partial and total reconstruction within either group A or C. A few partial and total prosthesis types had low failure rates, good mean air-bone gap hearing results, and tight spread of results to recommend them in group A cases. Total reconstruction had a lower prosthesis failure rate than partial reconstruction in group C cases, although mean air-bone gap hearing results were the same.

Bone Conduction

Radio frequency hearing: electrostrictive detection and bone conduction.

A hearing aid patented by C. R. Schafer and supposedly based on detection of an amplitude-modulated carrier wave in the auditory cortex was re-examined. It is shown here that the hearing aid actually works by bone conduction of sound. It is concluded that detection of the modulation signal occurs by electrical nonlinearities and electrostriction in the bones of the face and skull.

Bone Conduction