PubMed Health⌕ Search
Home/Archive/PubMed

PubMed · 9328732

Managing difficult labor: avoiding common pitfalls.

J C Warenski
View original source ↗Export metadata ↓

Abstract

The suggestions offered in this article represent an effort to reduce the incidence of cesarean delivery for dystocia while maintaining a safe course to vaginal birth. Avoiding difficult labor induction in which a compelling indication is lacking, providing prompt and effective oxytocin therapy of arrested first stage labor, and liberalizing the use of oxytocin therapy in selected cases of second-stage arrest are emphasized. With the widening use of conduction analgesia, indicated operative vaginal delivery has an increasingly important role in tempering cesarean birth rates. Operative vaginal delivery can play an effective role only when strict conditions to insure its safety are met.

Explore related subjects

Delivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansObstetric Labor ComplicationsOxytocinPregnancyJournal ArticleReview

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

J C Warenski. 1997. Managing difficult labor: avoiding common pitfalls.. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003081-199709000-00010

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

PubMed2007

Effects of teamwork training on adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of teamwork training on the occurrence of adverse outcomes and process of care in labor and delivery. METHODS: A cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted at seven intervention and eight control hospitals. The intervention was a standardized teamwork training curriculum based on crew resource management that emphasized communication and team structure. The primary outcome was the proportion of deliveries at 20 weeks or more of gestation in which one or more adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes or both occurred (Adverse Outcome Index). Additional outcomes included 11 clinical process measures. RESULTS: A total of 1,307 personnel were trained and 28,536 deliveries analyzed. At baseline, there were no differences in demographic or delivery characteristics between the groups. The mean Adverse Outcome Index prevalence was similar in the control and intervention groups, both at baseline and after implementation of teamwork training (9.4% versus 9.0% and 7.2% versus 8.3%, respectively). The intracluster correlation coefficient was 0.015, with a resultant wide confidence interval for the difference in mean Adverse Outcome Index between groups (-5.6% to 3.2%). One process measure, the time from the decision to perform an immediate cesarean delivery to the incision, differed significantly after team training (33.3 minutes versus 21.2 minutes, P=.03). CONCLUSION: Training, as was conducted and implemented, did not transfer to a detectable impact in this study. The Adverse Outcome Index could be an important tool for comparing obstetric outcomes within and between institutions to help guide quality improvement. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: (www.ClinicalTrials.gov), NCT00381056 LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Delivery, Obstetric↗