PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9336554

Computerized patient record: are we prepared for our future practice?

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To survey members of The American Dietetic Association (ADA) regarding care documentation systems, computerization of patient care records, and factors to be considered in developing a documentation system compatible with a computer-based patient record. DESIGN: The survey instrument was developed in conjunction with a survey consultant/statistician, then mailed to the study sample. SUBJECTS/SETTING: The sample of 500 was drawn from three ADA dietetic practice groups expected to include a high percentage of clinical practitioners. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PERFORMED: Basic frequency displays were used on all questionnaire items. Pearson correlation coefficients were used among numeric variables, and oneway analysis of variance was used for categoric variables with quantitative variables. RESULTS: A total of 171 usable surveys were returned (34%), primarily from dietitians working in an acute-care inpatient environment. The SOAP format (subjective, objective, assessment, and plan) was used by 60% of respondents to document nutrition assessments, although a number of other documentation formats were reported. Most commonly used data in nutrition decision making were medical diagnosis, diet order, anthropometric data, and laboratory values. Most commonly used outcomes measures included laboratory values, tolerance of the nutrition regimen, weight changes, and intake changes. Only 15% of respondents reported that they currently used a computerized patient record. Ninety-three percent of respondents favored standardized nutrition diagnoses, and 95% believed standardized nutrition interventions would prove useful. APPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that dietitians evaluate, standardize, and streamline their documentation to prepare for implementation of computerized systems. The diagnoses and interventions presented in this study could be a starting point.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Biesemeier, C S Chima. 1997. Computerized patient record: are we prepared for our future practice?. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-8223(97)00268-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Probability estimation when some observations are grouped.

This paper considers the use of additional questions for decreasing survey non-response rates and an approach for estimating a probability based on the results obtained. In a survey, the respondents are asked to answer an original question and follow-up questions, where the answers for the follow-up questions are grouped answers for the original question. For example, respondents are asked to provide an exact number of incidents, but in cases of 'Do not know' or 'Refuse' responses, they are subsequently asked to pick an answer from a less specific categorical scale. The new estimator obtains smaller variance asymptotically and does not depend on a distribution family. This method is applied to income questions in a survey regarding injury prevention and behaviours. Another application is survey data on intimate partner violence, where some amendments were applied for incorporating post-stratification weights and for using non-random grouping. For additional illustration, an example of parameter estimation on artificially generated data is presented.

Data Collection↗