PubMed · 9339521
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
J D Iams. 1997. Cervical ultrasonography.. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1997.10030156.x
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
BACKGROUND: Artificial insemination with sperm is used to improve the chances of conception for various causes of infertility. Traditionally, sperm is deposited in or around the endocervical canal (cervical insemination - CI). Some studies reported higher pregnancy rates if sperm was deposited in the uterine cavity itself (intrauterine insemination - IUI), but most were uncontrolled. However the cost and the risks (infection and anaphylaxis) of IUI may also be higher. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of depositing donor sperm in the uterine cavity (intrauterine insemination) compared to cervical insemination. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Cochrane Subfertility Review Group specialised register of controlled trials was searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing intrauterine insemination and cervical insemination, using fresh or cryopreserved semen, with or without ovarian hyperstimulation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality assessment and data extraction were done independently by two reviewers. MAIN RESULTS: Twelve studies were included. They comprised 697 patients undergoing 2215 treatment cycles. Ten trials used frozen semen, with three using ovarian hyperstimulation. Overall the methodological quality of the trials was low. The overall pregnancy rate per cycle in the intrauterine insemination group was 18% compared to 5% for cervical insemination. When cryopreserved donor sperm was used, the overall chance of pregnancy in spontaneous or clomiphene-corrected cycles was significantly higher with intrauterine insemination. This was irrespective of whether pregnancy rates were calculated on a per cycle (odds ratio 2. 63, 95% confidence interval 1.85 to 3.73) or per patient (odds ratio 3.86, 95% confidence interval 1.81 to 8.25) basis. The greatest benefit appeared in trials with poor pregnancy rates (less than 6%) for cervical insemination. There was no difference in pregnancy rate between intrauterine and cervical insemination when fresh donor sperm was used (odds ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.36 to 2. 24). REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Intrauterine insemination appears to be beneficial when cervical insemination using cryopreserved donor sperm has had low pregnancy rates. This applies to spontaneous, clomiphene corrected and gonadotrophin stimulated cycles. However it may offer little benefit where high pregnancy rates have been achieved with cervical insemination. There appears to be no additional benefit from intrauterine insemination when fresh sperm is used for donor insemination.
In this article the role of MR imaging in the management of cervical cancer is reviewed and illustrated. The appearance of the normal uterine cervix and of cervical carcinoma is shown. Important factors for optimal MR imaging of cervical carcinoma are reviewed. The value of MR imaging in the staging of cervical carcinoma is illustrated by showing parametrial invasion and lymph node involvement. Finally, the value of MR imaging staging is compared with clinical staging, CT staging, and surgical findings. The role of new imaging techniques, such as fast dynamic enhanced MR imaging, is described.
PURPOSE: The appearance of the cervical mucosa is regulated by different factors including retinoic acid. Hormone-dependent alteration of the cervix uteri mucosa is accompanied by a decrease or increase of cytoplasmatic retinoic-acid-binding protein (CRABP). To elucidate whether this hormone-dependent alteration of CRABP is preserved in the case of neoplasms of the cervix uteri, we measured the level of total and apo-CRABP in normal and neoplastically transformed cervical cells. METHODS: In a prospective pilot study, standardised biopsies of normal epithelium and cervical intra-epithelial neoplasm grade 3 (CIN III) were taken from 24 patients. A newly developed method was used to determine the intra-epithelial level of apo- and total CRABP. RESULTS: The concentration of total CRABP in normal squamous epithelium compared with that in intra-epithelial neoplasm grade 3 is very significantly lower in the CIN III areas (normal: 3.66 +/- 1.46 pmol/ mg wet weight +/- SD; CIN III 1.43 +/- 0.59 pmol/mg P < 0.01). In addition CRABP in the apo form is lower in normal than in neoplastic epithelium (Wilcoxon test for paired non-parametric values: P < 0.05; mean for all patients: normal: 1.65 + 0.82 pmol/mg; CIN III: 1.14 +/- 0.23 pmol/mg). CONCLUSION: From our results we conclude that, in neoplastically transformed cells, the hormone-dependent CRABP cycle is interrupted. Whether this has consequences for the further development of the neoplastic cells has to be elucidated.