PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9363376

Current issues in exercise metabolism: the crossover concept.

Abstract

1. Since ancient times, athletes have consumed proteins because of the belief they were the necessary substrate for optimal performance. Even though this concept was proven to be incorrect before the beginning of the 19th century, the practice continued until several decades ago. 2. By 1939, careful metabolic investigations on the changes in the respiratory exchange ratio had demonstrated that the metabolic transformations of lipids and carbohydrates were the primary sources of energy for muscular exercise. 3. Metabolic investigations on the profile of energy transformations during exercise have indicated that aspects related to exercise intensity, state of training, the availability of circulating free fatty acids, the activity of the sympathetic nervous system, resting levels of muscle and liver glycogen and muscle triglyceride concentrations have to be considered to explain a specific response. 4. In 1994, Brooks and Mercier introduced the concept of 'crossover' in their review manuscript to explain the shift in substrate utilization from lipids to carbohydrates by trained subjects when the power output was increased. In addition, the concept was advanced to reconcile divergent results by different investigators. 5. In 1995, Coggan and associates investigated the glucose kinetics of non-trained and trained subjects performing power outputs equal to 80% VO2max and concluded that the crossover concept was unable to explain their metabolic results from trained subjects. 6. Because of the importance of the topic to exercise physiologists and the uncertainties the controversy has created for teachers and researchers, the American Physiological Society Section on Environmental and Exercise Physiology scheduled a Point-Counterpoint forum at the 1997 Experimental Biology Meeting. The subsequent manuscripts of Brooks and Coggan are a result of that forum.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C M Tipton. 1997. Current issues in exercise metabolism: the crossover concept.. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1681.1997.tb02711.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Divergent PXR function in seals: Endocrine adaptation or functional loss?

Seals accumulate xenobiotics through dietary biomagnification and exposure to polluted marine environments, with contaminants concentrating in their blubber. Biotransformation mitigates xenobiotic toxicity by converting lipophilic compounds into excretable hydrophilic metabolites, a process coordinated by nuclear receptors including the Pregnane X Receptor (PXR), whose plastic ligand-binding domain enables broad xenobiotic sensing. By examining PXR in pinnipeds, we investigated the evolutionary conservation and functional characterization of PXR using genomic sequence analysis, protein structural prediction, and transactivation assays, revealing broadly conserved structural features alongside species-specific functional divergence in receptor responsiveness to environmental stressors. Specifically, the obtained results highlight divergent gene and functional landscapes with ORF-disrupting mutations identified in Monachus monachus and Neomonachus schauinslandi that abolish receptor activation toward known PXR ligands. In contrast, Leptonychotes weddelli retained an intact PXR ORF but showed reduced receptor activity, revealing functional divergence in PXR among pinnipeds.

Biotransformation↗

Biotransformation of raspberry ketone and zingerone by cultured cells of Phytolacca americana.

The biotransformation of raspberry ketone and zingerone were individually investigated using cultured cells of Phytolacca americana. In addition to (2S)-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-butanol (2%), (2S)-4-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-butanol (5%), 4-[4-(beta-d-glucopyranosyloxy)phenyl]-2-butanone (19%), 4-[(3S)-3-hydroxybutyl]phenyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (23%), and (2S)-4-(4-hydroxyphenyl)but-2-yl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (20%), two biotransformation products, i.e., 2-hydroxy-4-[(3S)-3-hydroxybutyl]phenyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (12%) and 2-hydroxy-5-[(3S)-3-hydroxybutyl]phenyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (11%), were isolated from suspension cells after incubation with raspberry ketone for three days. On the other hand, two compounds, i.e., (2S)-4-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)but-2-yl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (17%) and (2S)-2-(beta-d-glucopyranosyloxy)-4-[4-(beta-d-glucopyranosyloxy)-3-methoxyphenyl]butane (16%), together with (2S)-4-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-2-butanol (15%), 4-[4-(beta-d-glucopyranosyloxy)-3-methoxyphenyl]-2-butanone (21%), and 4-[(3S)-3-hydroxybutyl]-2-methoxyphenyl-beta-d-glucopyranoside (24%) were obtained upon addition of zingerone. Cultured cells of P. americana can reduce, and regioselectively hydroxylate and glucosylate, these food ingredients to their beta-glycosides.

Biotransformation↗

Metabolism and bioactivation of 3-methylindole by human liver microsomes.

Metabolism and bioactivation of 3-methylindole (3MI) were investigated in human liver microsomes. The metabolism of two deuterium-labeled analogues of 3MI permitted a relatively unambiguous identification of multiple metabolites and glutathione (GSH) adducts of reactive intermediates. A total of eight oxidized metabolites were detected, five of which were assigned as previously identified 3-methyloxindole, 3-hydroxy-3-methylindolenine, 3-hydroxy-3-methyloxindole, 5-hydroxy-3-methylindole, and 6-hydroxy-3-methylindole. Among the three new metabolites, one was either 4- or 7-OH-3-methylindole, and the other two were derived from additional oxidation on the phenyl ring of 3-methyloxindole. When GSH was added to the microsomal incubations, seven conjugates that had molecular ions corresponding to the incorporation of GSH and an atom of oxygen at m/z 453 (group I) were produced, and two additional conjugates had molecular ions at m/z 437 that corresponded to the incorporation of GSH with no additional oxygen (group II). Two conjugates in group I (m/z 453) were apparently derived by GSH addition to the 5,6-epoxide metabolite of 3-methyloxindole. These two GSH adducts were tentatively identified as 5-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methyloxindole and 6-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methyloxindole. The most abundant conjugate in group I was identified as 3-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methyloxindole, which substantiated the presence of the putative 2,3-epoxy-3-methylindole intermediate. The remaining four adducts in group I were likely formed by conjugation of GSH at different positions of the phenyl ring, possibly via oxidation of 5-hydroxy-3-methylindole and 6-hydroxy-3-methylindole to two very interesting new electrophilic benzoquinone imine intermediates. For the group II conjugates (m/z 437), two isomers were identified as 2-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methylindole and 3-(glutathione-S-yl-methyl)-indole. The former adduct was primarily derived from the 2,3-epoxide intermediate by thiol conjugation followed by dehydration. The latter adduct was consistent with our previously published work on the dehydrogenation of 3MI. In those studies, we showed that the reactive intermediate, 3-methylenenindolenine, was formed by hydrogen abstraction at the methyl group and was trapped with GSH. The putative dehydrogenation bioactivation mechanism is also substantiated by the finding that CYP2E1 selectively generated 2-(glutathione-S-yl)-3-methylindole but did not produce 3-(glutathione-S-yl-methyl)-indole. In summary, the results not only confirmed the formation of 2,3-epoxide-3-methylindole in human liver microsomes but also suggested that the phenolic metabolites of 3-methylindole were dehydrogenated to previously uncharacterized reactive intermediates.

Biotransformation↗