PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9366111

[Nephronophthisis].

Abstract

Nephronophthisis is an autosomal recessive tubulointerstitial nephropathy leading to end-stage renal failure during adolescence or early adulthood. Initial symptoms of pitressoresistant polyuria and polydipsia start around 3 years of age, increase over the following years and are often responsible for growth retardation. Renal function declines slowly and end-stage renal failure occurs around 12 years of age in most cases. At ultrasound examination, kidneys have a normal or slightly decreased size, parenchymal echogenicity is increased and the differentiation is reduced. When they are present, medullary cysts are an important feature. Renal biopsy shows atropic or dilated tubules, with irregular thickened basal membranes. Interstitial fibrosis and glomerular sclerosis develop progressively. Various extrarenal abnormalities have been reported in association with nephronophthisis; the most frequent is congenital amaurosis. The most recent advance is the localization of a gene (NPH1) on chromosome 2q13. Deletions in this gene have been shown in about 80% of patients with isolated renal involvement. Such deletions have never been reported when nephronophthisis is associated with congenital amaurosis. The evidence of a deletion in NPH1 gene now allows the diagnosis of nephronophthisis to be performed without renal biopsy. When a delation has been demonstrated in one child, the identification of the deletion in siblings allows to determine those who are affected and those who are not, to propose a reliable prenatal diagnosis.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

C Loirat. 1997-09-15. [Nephronophthisis].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9366111/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Further evidence for the increased power of LOD scores compared with nonparametric methods.

In genetic analysis of diseases in which the underlying model is unknown, "model free" methods-such as affected sib pair (ASP) tests-are often preferred over LOD-score methods, although LOD-score methods under the correct or even approximately correct model are more powerful than ASP tests. However, there might be circumstances in which nonparametric methods will outperform LOD-score methods. Recently, Dizier et al. reported that, in some complex two-locus (2L) models, LOD-score methods with segregation analysis-derived parameters had less power to detect linkage than ASP tests. We investigated whether these particular models, in fact, represent a situation that ASP tests are more powerful than LOD scores. We simulated data according to the parameters specified by Dizier et al. and analyzed the data by using a (a) single locus (SL) LOD-score analysis performed twice, under a simple dominant and a recessive mode of inheritance (MOI), (b) ASP methods, and (c) nonparametric linkage (NPL) analysis. We show that SL analysis performed twice and corrected for the type I-error increase due to multiple testing yields almost as much linkage information as does an analysis under the correct 2L model and is more powerful than either the ASP method or the NPL method. We demonstrate that, even for complex genetic models, the most important condition for linkage analysis is that the assumed MOI at the disease locus being tested is approximately correct, not that the inheritance of the disease per se is correctly specified. In the analysis by Dizier et al., segregation analysis led to estimates of dominance parameters that were grossly misspecified for the locus tested in those models in which ASP tests appeared to be more powerful than LOD-score analyses.

Genes, Dominant

[A medico-genetic description of inhabitants of two regions of the Kransnodar Krai].

The spectrum and prevalence rate of hereditary pathology in Kanevskii and Bryukhovetskii raions (districts) of Krasnodar krai (territory) were analyzed. The total size of the studied population was 145,937. The prevalence rate of monogenic hereditary pathology was estimated. This value was 1.08 +/- 0.08, 0.72 +/- 0.07, and 0.20 +/- 0.06 per 1000 people for autosomal dominant (AD), autosomal recessive (AR), and X-linked (XL) recessive diseases, respectively. Forty-two AD (158 affected persons in 82 families), 32 AR (105 affected persons in 82 families), and 6 XL disease entities (13 affected persons in 8 families) were found. A slight genetic subdivision was found in the populations of Kanevskii and Bryukhovetskii raions. However, it was not found to affect the prevalence of hereditary pathology.

Genes, Dominant