PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9368859

Profiloplasty: variations in personal views.

Abstract

There is sometimes controversy among colleagues over treatment plans in orthognathic surgery. This is because there are differing ideas about which part of the facial skeleton should be moved to give an optimal result. A study was therefore set up to obtain insight into the differences between surgeons. Ten unbalanced profile drawings were given to seven experienced surgeons with the request that they draw the profile line which they would like to give these patients. It was acceptable either to draw the profiles 'artistically' off the cuff or to use additional construction lines as long as this was not the profile planning according to Brons and Mulié (1993). The evaluation showed that some surgeons drew profiles which resembled each other to some extent in proportions and inclinations, while others produced variations without any evident regularity and basic concept. The variability per profile was very important in almost all cases. Such discrepancies are not acceptable in a teaching centre.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

H P Freihofer, R E Mooren. 1997. Profiloplasty: variations in personal views.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-5182(97)80061-3

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

In the wake of hospital inquiries: impact on staff and safety.

Mishandled concerns about clinical standards resulted in whistleblowing in four Australian hospitals. Official inquiries followed with recommendations to improve patient safety. In the aftermath of the inquiries, common themes included loss of trust in management and among clinical colleagues, and loss of trust from patients and the community. Without first rebuilding trust, staff will not report mistakes or other concerns about safety. Successful implementation of patient safety procedures requires policies to stress the professional duty of staff to report concerns about colleagues when they believe there is a risk to patients.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Retrieving the ars moriendi tradition.

North Atlantic culture lacks a commonly shared view on dying well that helps the dying, their social environment and caregivers to determine their place and role, interpret death and deal with the process of ethical deliberation. What is lacking nowadays, however, has been part of Western culture in medieval times and was known as the ars moriendi (art of dying well) tradition. In this paper an updated version of this tradition is presented that meets the demands of present day secularized and multiform society. Five themes are central to the new art of dying: autonomy and the self, pain control and medical intervention, attachment and relations, life balance and guilt, death and afterlife. The importance of retrieving the ancient ars moriendi outreaches the boundaries of palliative medicine, since it deals with issues that play a central role in every context of medical intervention and treatment.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗