PubMed · 9386969
The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.
Explore connections, maps & timelines
M Nangaku, R J Johnson, W G Couser. Glomerulonephritis and complement regulatory proteins.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9386969/
Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.
KEEP EXPLORING
Patient-tumor-specific oligonucleotides were generated for the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) in a highly specific and sensitive clonotypic polymerase chain reaction (cPCR). The clone-specific region of highest diversity, CDR-III, was PCR amplified and sequenced. Nested CDR-III clonotypic primers were used in a semi-nested cPCR with a sensitivity of at least 1 in 10(5) cells. Patients with protocol-eligible Rai intermediate or high-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) received induction with fludarabine 25 mg/m(2) per day for 5 days every 4 weeks for 6 cycles, followed by consolidative high-dose cyclophosphamide (1.5, 2.25, or 3g/m(2)). cPCR was performed on peripheral blood and bone marrow mononuclear cells. All 5 patients achieving a clinical partial remission (PR) studied by cPCR were positive. Five patients achieved nodular PR (nPR) (residual nodules or suspicious lymphocytic infiltrates in a bone marrow biopsy as the sole suggestion of residual disease). Five of 5 patients with nPR were cPCR positive. In contrast, flow cytometry for CD5-CD19 dual staining and kappa--lambda clonal excess detected MRD in only 3 of the same 5 nPR patients, all of whom were cPCR positive, and immunohistochemistry detected MRD in only 1 of 4 assessable patients. Three of 7 CR patients evaluable by cPCR had MRD. Only 1 CR patient had MRD by flow cytometry; that patient was also cPCR positive. These data support the conclusions that nodular PR in CLL represents MRD and that clonotypic PCR detects MRD in CLL more frequently than flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry. (Blood. 2001;97:1929-1936)
Leukostasis and tissue infiltration by leukemic cells are poorly understood life-threatening complications of acute leukemia. This study has tested the hypothesis that adhesion receptors and cytokines secreted by blast cells play central roles in these reactions. Immunophenotypic studies showed that acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells (n = 78) of the M0 to M5 subtypes of the French-American-British Cooperative Group expressed various amounts of adhesion receptors, including CD11a, b, c/CD18, CD49d, e, f/CD29, CD54, sCD15, and L-selectin. The presence of functional adhesion receptors was evaluated using a nonstatic adhesion assay. The number of blast cells attached to unactivated endothelium increased by 7 to 31 times after a 6-hour exposure of endothelium to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha. Inhibition studies showed that multiple adhesion receptors--including L-selectin, E-selectin, VCAM-1, and CD11/CD18--were involved in blast cell adhesion to TNF-alpha-activated endothelium. Leukemic cells were then cocultured at 37 degrees C on unactivated endothelial cell monolayers for time periods up to 24 hours. A time-dependent increase in the number of blasts attached to the endothelium and a concomitant induction of ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin were observed. Additional experiments revealed that endothelial cell activation by leukemic myeloblasts was caused by cytokine secretion by blast cells, in particular TNF-alpha and IL-1 beta, and direct contacts between adhesion receptors expressed by blast cells and endothelial cells. Thus, leukemic cells have the ability to generate conditions that promote their own adhesion to vascular endothelium, a property that may have important implications for the pathophysiology of leukostasis and tissue infiltration by leukemic blast cells. (Blood. 2001;97:2121-2129)
Vav1 and Vav2 are members of the Dbl family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors for the Rho family of small GTPases. Although the role of Vav1 during lymphocyte development and activation is well characterized, the function of Vav2 is still unclear. In this study, we compared the signaling pathways regulated by Vav1 and Vav2 following engagement of the T cell receptor (TCR). We show that Vav2 is tyrosine-phosphorylated upon TCR stimulation and by co-expressed Src and Syk family kinases. Using glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins, we observed that the Src homology 2 domain of Vav2 binds tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins from TCR-stimulated Jurkat T cell lysates, including c-Cbl and SLP-76. Like Vav1, Vav2 cooperated with TCR stimulation to increase extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation and to promote c-fos serum response element transcriptional activity. Moreover, both proteins displayed a similar action in increasing the expression of the early activation marker CD69 in Jurkat T cells. However, in contrast to Vav1, Vav2 dramatically suppressed TCR signals leading to nuclear factor of activated T cells (NF-AT)-dependent transcription and induction of the interleukin-2 promoter. Vav2 appears to act upstream of the phosphatase calcineurin because a constitutively active form of calcineurin rescued the effect of Vav2 by restoring TCR-induced NF-AT activation. Interestingly, the Dbl homology and Src homology 2 domains of Vav2 were necessary for its inhibitory effect on NF-AT activation and for induction of serum response element transcriptional activity. Taken together, our results indicate that Vav1 and Vav2 exert overlapping but nonidentical functions in T cells. The negative regulatory pathway elicited by Vav2 might play an important role in regulating lymphocyte activation processes.