PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9402550

Palliative medicine training for physicians.

Abstract

In recent years, it has been widely recognised that modern doctors are not receiving the training they need to provide appropriate and effective palliative care. Deficiencies in care have been reported in several formal studies and, anecdotally, in many professional and popular lay publications. Doctors themselves have attested to their lack of confidence and competence in many aspects of palliative care. These problems cross national, cultural and religious boundaries, as evidenced by initiatives in many countries to correct the situation, which will be reviewed in this paper.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

D Doyle. 1997. Palliative medicine training for physicians.. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00007722

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Existence and pluralism: the rediscovery of Karl Jaspers.

Karl Jaspers has been recognized in psychiatry mostly for his influence on phenomenology and on certain aspects of psychopathology, such as our understanding of delusions. In this paper, I will highlight the need to rediscover Jaspers' work in terms of other important ideas that he can contribute to psychiatry, in particular the concepts of limit situations, transcendence and pluralism. Limit situations refer to the fact that human life is characterized by existential situations, or crises, which become opportunities for authentic existence. Transcendence refers to the notion that freedom is an important aspect of human existence and cannot be explained by purely scientific understanding or encompassed by any purely rationalistic system of thought. Pluralism is perhaps Jaspers' most original perspective, which has still failed to be adequately appreciated by the psychiatric profession. The idea here is that science means understanding the methods by which we obtain knowledge, along with the presuppositions and limits of those methods. Contemporary psychiatry has only a limited appreciation of Jaspers' work. In this paper, I attempt to describe these important concepts that can help us understand what we do in psychiatry, what we should be doing and why.

Attitude to Death↗