PubMed HealthSearch

PubMed · 9420973

The multicompartment block.

Abstract

The source did not provide an abstract. Follow the original record for more information.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G Mitterschiffthaler. 1997. The multicompartment block.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9420973/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Manual removal of the placenta. Incidence and clinical significance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence and complications related to manual removal of the placenta. METHODS: Review of hospital medical records from 1990 throughout 1994. One thousand five hundred and two vaginal deliveries from 1984 1992 were used for comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 24,750 deliveries were registered during the five year study period. Placenta was removed manually in 165 women (0.6%). The use of general anesthesia for manual removal of placenta decreased from 74% in 1990 to 19% in 1994. Spinal analgesia was applied from 1993, and it was used in 42% of the women in 1994. Of 74 parous women, 12 (16%) had experienced retained placenta before. The average difference in the hemoglobin concentration between the prenatal and the postoperative values was 3.4 g/dl among the patients, and 10% required blood transfusion (1-4 units). Among the controls, there was no decrease in the average hemoglobin concentration, and only 0.5 needed blood transfusion. Endometritis following manual removal was detected in 1.8% of the patients and 1.5% among the controls. Despite manual removal, five women (3%) were considered to have retained placental fragments two days or later after delivery, which required curettage. CONCLUSIONS: Placenta needed to be removed manually in 0.60% of all deliveries in our department. It was associated with increased incidence of hemorrhage and consequently low hemoglobin values. Women with a history of retained placenta have an increased risk of recurrence of retained placenta in subsequent deliveries.

Anesthesia, Epidural

No risk of metal toxicity in combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

UNLABELLED: Using the single level needle-through-needle technique for combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSE) may introduce very fine metal particles abraded by the spinal needle from the inner ground edge of the Tuohy needle into the patient. Either the local anesthetic administered epidurally or the peridural catheter may also pass intrathecally through the hole in the dura made by the spinal needle. To examine these concerns, the needle-through-needle technique was simulated in an in vitro model (18-gauge Tuohy needle; 27- or 29-gauge Quincke needle). The presence of abraded metal particles was identified by atomic absorption spectrography (AAS). The needles were then examined under an electron microscope. Metal particles could not be identified by using AAS in the needle-through-needle technique after normal clinical use, nor could traces of use be revealed by using an electron microscope to examine the Tuohy needle. With intentionally rough handling and caudal orientation of the spinal needle tip, minimal scratches could be seen by using an electron microscope, but there were no metal particles detected by AAS. In an anatomical preparation, the possible passage of the epidural catheter anesthetic through the dural puncture hole into the cerebrospinal fluid compartment was investigated endoscopically. Neither passage of dyed epidural local anesthetic nor penetration of the epidural catheter into the cerebrospinal fluid compartment could be demonstrated by endoscopy. We conclude that the needle-through-needle-technique is an acceptable way of performing CSE anesthesia. Endangering the patient by an unintentionally intrathecal misplacement of the epidural catheter seems to be very unlikely based on our in vitro model if small spinal needles (27- or 29-gauge) are used. IMPLICATIONS: Atomic absorption spectrography shows no contamination of the intrathecal compartment by abraded metal particles from the Tuohy needle by combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with the needle-through-needle technique. In vitro, neither passage of dyed epidural local anesthetic nor penetration of the epidural catheter into the cerebrospinal fluid compartment could be demonstrated by endoscopy.

Anesthesia, Epidural