PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9433962

Triplets and embryo transfer policy.

Abstract

The social and financial consequences of multiple pregnancies following embryo transfer have led us to question our policies and re-evaluate 'good practice' recommendations. A postal survey was carried out to assess current practice regarding embryo transfer policy and to understand the factors on which these decisions are based. The results demonstrated a wide variation in practice throughout the country despite the finding that most centres use the same criteria on which to base their decision to transfer either two or three embryos. Doctors seem to be the most influential individuals in the decision-making process, although when three embryos are transferred, the opinion of the patient is paramount. Patients are usually given information about the risks of multiple pregnancy but despite this, 69% felt that a multiple pregnancy would be the ideal outcome of in-vitro fertilization (IVF). It is strongly advised that patients are given more details of the consequences of multiple pregnancy and that centres which have a high multiple pregnancy rate adopt a policy of transferring only two embryos.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

A Murdoch. 1997. Triplets and embryo transfer policy.. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9433962/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

[Elective single embryo transfer in assisted reproduction].

BACKGROUND: In Norway, assisted reproduction has been regulated by law since 1987, but the in vitro fertilization (IVF)-clinics are free to decide the number of embryos transferred. During the 1990ies, the number of embryos replaced was reduced from three to two. Triplets almost disappeared, but the twinning rate remained unchanged. According to the latest national data, 27.5 % of the deliveries following IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in 2002 were multiple births. In our hospital, 23.9 % of the deliveries following IVF/ICSI in 2003 were multiple births. To reduce the multiple pregnancy rate, eSET was introduced as a routine in patients with a high probability to become pregnant in November 2004. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The results of eSET from the beginning of November 2004 until July 2005 are presented. All three inclusion criteria for eSET had to be fulfilled: 1) age <or= 35 years, 2) first or second treatment, 3) at least one top quality embryo. RESULTS AND INTERPRETATION: 163 out of 644 treatment cycles fulfilled all three criteria for eSET. For 54 (33 %) of the treated women, the treatment has resulted in live births or ongoing pregnancies, compared to 23 % of the treatments with two transferred embryos. The overall pregnancy rate was only slightly decreased (32.4 %) compared to before implementation of eSET (34 %). In the eSET group, 60 % of the patients had embryos available for cryopreservation. The cumulative pregnancy rate per started treatment cycle is expected to increase when pregnancies following transfer of frozen-thawed embryos are included. The overall twinning rate was reduced to 18.1 %. It should be possible to reduce the twinning rate further by for example raising the age-limit for eSET. An optimal trade-off between cumulative ongoing pregnancy rate and twinning rate could more easily be obtained if the Norwegian IVF-clinics and authorities establish an eSET policy.

Embryo Transfer↗

Is what we clearly see really so obvious? Ultrasonography and transcervical embryo transfer--a review.

OBJECTIVE: To critically review the role of ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (ET) and its influence on the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF). DESIGN: Medline review of published manuscripts. RESULT(S): Studies evaluating the role of ultrasound-assisted ET have had mixed results, and although meta-analysis of prospective trials suggests an improvement in outcome, limitations in study design may overstate the effect of ultrasonography. Other ET techniques may eliminate the advantages provided by ultrasonography, limiting its benefit to specific clinical scenarios. However, because no trial has demonstrated an adverse effect and because cases that may benefit from its use often cannot be predicted reliably, the routine application of ultrasonography can be justified.

Embryo Transfer↗