PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9440419

Increased vulnerability to eccentric exercise-induced dysfunction and muscle injury after concentric training.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test whether concentric (CON)-only resistance training increases the vulnerability to eccentric (ECC) exercise-induced dysfunction and muscle injury. DESIGN: Before-after trial. SETTING: General community. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Nine men (77 +/- 3 kg body weight) who were not trained in resistance exercise. INTERVENTION: Nine weeks of CON-only training of the left quadriceps femoris (QF); performance of 10 sets of 10 ECC actions with each QF using a load equivalent to 85% of the posttraining CON 1-repetition maximum (1RM). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: CON 1RM for the untrained and trained QF measured immediately after training, and again 1, 3, 8, and 10 days after the bout of ECC exercise; cross-sectional area and spin-spin relaxation time (T2) of each QF determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before and 3 days after the ECC exercise bout. RESULTS: As a result of the ECC bout, the CON 1RM was reduced by approximately 30% in the trained limb and 16% in the untrained limb. Strength did not return to normal in the trained limb even after 10 days of recovery; however, in the untrained limb strength was restored by day 8. As assessed by MRI, the trained limb showed a greater area of muscle injury compared with the untrained QF. The T2 of the injured area was similar in both limbs, suggesting that the intensity of injury was similar, but more widespread in the trained limb. CONCLUSION: CON-only training increases the vulnerability to ECC exercise-induced dysfunction and muscle injury, probably by increasing the CON 1RM, thus allowing the individual to be exposed to greater ECC loading potential.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

L L Ploutz-Snyder, P A Tesch, G A Dudley. 1998. Increased vulnerability to eccentric exercise-induced dysfunction and muscle injury after concentric training.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(98)90209-x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Molecular heterochrony and the evolution of sociality in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris).

Sibling care is a hallmark of social insects, but its evolution remains challenging to explain at the molecular level. The hypothesis that sibling care evolved from ancestral maternal care in primitively eusocial insects has been elaborated to involve heterochronic changes in gene expression. This elaboration leads to the prediction that workers in these species will show patterns of gene expression more similar to foundress queens, who express maternal care behaviour, than to established queens engaged solely in reproductive behaviour. We tested this idea in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) using a microarray platform with approximately 4500 genes. Unlike the wasp Polistes metricus, in which support for the above prediction has been obtained, we found that patterns of brain gene expression in foundress and queen bumblebees were more similar to each other than to workers. Comparisons of differentially expressed genes derived from this study and gene lists from microarray studies in Polistes and the honeybee Apis mellifera yielded a shared set of genes involved in the regulation of related social behaviours across independent eusocial lineages. Together, these results suggest that multiple independent evolutions of eusociality in the insects might have involved different evolutionary routes, but nevertheless involved some similarities at the molecular level.

Analysis of Variance↗

Confidence intervals for the standardized effect arising in the comparison of two normal populations.

Confidence intervals for a standardized effect are derived after stabilizing the variance of the Welch t-statistic. Simulation studies demonstrate the viability of the resulting intervals for a wide range of parameter values and sample sizes as small as five. The methodology is extended to the combination of results from several studies, so as to obtain a confidence interval for a representative standardized effect for all the studies. The methods are illustrated on a recent meta-analytic study of systolic blood pressure reduction during a weight reducing regime, as well as the classical Mumford data on psychological intervention and hospital length of stay.

Analysis of Variance↗