PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9442791

Baltimore Vision Screening Project. Phase 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vision screening in preschool and school age children remains a valuable method of identifying potentially treatable visual abnormalities, as well as refractive errors in the school age population. A major difficulty in conducting these types of programs is the inconsistent follow-up encountered frequently in children identified by the screening program. The Baltimore Vision Screening Project was designed to address the issue of access to care for a group of inner city elementary school students by providing on-site evaluation and treatment. METHODS: A standard vision-screening protocol was administered to prekindergarten and kindergarten students attending an inner city elementary school and access to care provided at the school. Children identified by the screening were examined at the school, and appropriate treatment was prescribed. The second phase of the study details a return to the school 1 year after the initial screening. The purpose of this was to reassess the level of visual morbidity in this population and to evaluate the effects of providing treatment in the previous year. RESULTS: Two hundred eighty-five children were screened during the 1994-1995 school year. Visual morbidity statistics from the follow-up year were similar to those of the previous screening: 5.3% diagnosed with amblyopia, 3.2% with strabismus, and 7.4% with refractive errors. Forty of the 68 children identified, examined, and treated in the previous year still were attending the school during the follow-up investigation. Compliance with recommended treatment was 30% in this group, with only 20% of the students passing the vision screening the following year. CONCLUSIONS: The follow-up screening confirmed the presence of significant visual morbidity in this group of preschool and kindergarten students. Nearly two thirds of the students had not complied with the recommended treatment or spectacle wear or both, despite providing immediate access to this care through the vision-screening program.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M W Preslan, A Novak. 1998. Baltimore Vision Screening Project. Phase 2.. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(98)91813-9

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Randomized controlled trial of the effects of nurse case manager and community health worker interventions on risk factors for diabetes-related complications in urban African Americans.

BACKGROUND: African Americans suffer disproportionately from diabetes complications, but little research has focused on how to improve diabetic control in this population. There are also few or no data on a combined primary care and community-based intervention approach. METHODS: We randomly assigned 186 urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes (76% female, mean A SD age 59 A 9 years) to 1 of 4 parallel arms: (1) usual care only; (2) usual care + nurse case manager (NCM); (3) usual care + community health worker (CHW); (4) usual care + nurse case manager/community health worker team. Using the framework of the Precede-Proceed behavioral model, interventions included patient counseling regarding self-care practices and physician reminders. RESULTS: The 2-year follow-up visit was completed by 149 individuals (84%). Compared to the Usual care group, the NCM group and the CHW group had modest declines in HbA(1c) over 2 years (0.3 and 0.3%, respectively), and the combined NCM/CHW group had a greater decline in HbA(1c) (0.8%. P = 0.137). After adjustment for baseline differences and/or follow-up time, the combined NCM/CHW group showed improvements in triglycerides (-35.5 mg/dl; P = 0.041) and diastolic blood pressure, compared to the usual care group (-5.6 mmHg; P = 0.042). CONCLUSIONS: Combined NCM/CHW interventions may improve diabetic control in urban African Americans with type 2 diabetes. Although results were clinically important, they did not reach statistical significance. This approach deserves further attention as a means to reduce the excess risk of diabetic complications in African Americans.

Baltimore↗