PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9445966

[Waiting for the crisis].

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: Experience in daily routine reveals that most of ICU patients usually go through "crisis" within 14 days of admission. Only few patients need remarkable more time to get to this point and it seems there is hardly anything to be done therapeutically to change the course of it. We therefore examined a large group of ICU patients in order to find reasons for this course or to spot them as an "entity of their own". METHODS: 1,861 ICU patients all being on IPPV for more than three days were included in the study. Every day 18 variables were taken down in a standardised way until the day IPPV was finished. We extracted 170 patients who were artificially ventilated for more than 40 days. For these patients we established mean values for each of the 18 variables during the first and the last 40 days of ventilation. In both groups we compared survivors to non-survivors. RESULTS: Mortality was almost the same in both groups (IPPV < 40 days vs. IPPV > 40 days). Survivors and non-survivors showed remarkable differences regarding extrapulmonary factors-in terms of total fluid amount and transfusion, state of abdomen, brain, liver and kidney function and circulation problems. Pulmonary factors revealed major differences only towards the end of the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: There seems to be an "entity of ist own", a small population of patients who arrive at the crucial turning point later. Pulmonary complications (pneumonia, ARDS) is not the reason but the expression of cause for prolonged ventilation. The key to the extrapulmonary origin of the crisis remains unknown, the only thing we can do is alleviate its manifestations.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

G D Giebel, M Doehn, M Müller-Gorges, R Stuttmann. 1997. [Waiting for the crisis].. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9445966/

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Overall and cause-specific mortality in ulcerative colitis: meta-analysis of population-based inception cohort studies.

OBJECTIVES: It remains debated whether patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are at greater risk of dying and whether a possible alteration in mortality can be attributed to specific causes of death. We aimed to clarify this issue by conducting a meta-analysis of population-based inception cohort studies on overall and cause-specific mortality in patients with UC. METHODS: The MEDLINE search engine and abstracts from international conferences were searched for relevant literature by use of explicit search criteria. STATA meta-analysis software was used to calculate pooled risk estimates (SMR, standardized mortality ratio, observed/expected deaths) of overall mortality and specific causes of death and to conduct metaregression analyses of the influence of specific variables on SMR. RESULTS: Ten papers fulfilled the inclusion criteria, reporting SMRs varying from 0.7 to 1.4. The overall pooled estimate was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9-1.2, P= 0.42). However, greater risk of dying was observed during the first years of follow-up, in patients with extensive colitis, and in patients from Scandinavia. Metaregression analysis showed an increase in SMR by increasing cohort size. UC-related mortality accounted for 17% of all deaths. Mortality from gastrointestinal diseases, nonalcoholic liver diseases, pulmonary embolisms, and respiratory diseases was increased whereas mortality from pulmonary cancer was reduced. CONCLUSIONS: The overall risk of dying in patients with UC did not differ from that of the background population, although subgroups of patients were at greater risk of dying. The cause-of-death distribution seemed to differ from that of the background population.

Cause of Death↗