PubMed Health⌕ Search

PubMed · 9448813

Defensive dental behaviour: illusion or reality?

Abstract

Defensive medicine or defensive behaviour of physicians is considered a major problem in contemporary health care. It seems reasonable to assume that defensive behaviour also occurs in dental practice, although so far very little has been published in the dental literature on this subject. The main objective of this study was to investigate whether defensive behaviour occurs in dentistry. As a survey study 38 dentists were interviewed: 30 men and 8 women, mainly general dental practitioners with an average of 20.9 years in practice. The results of this pilot-study indicate that it is very likely that defensive behaviour occurs in dental practice, despite the fact that there is hardly any evidence of fear for malpractice claims and lawsuits among the respondents. The majority of the dentists interviewed stated that they carried out some treatments at their patient's request although they did not believe the treatment to be necessary from a professional point of view. A motive for deliberately refraining from treatment is lack of dental motivation by the patient and poor oral hygiene. According to some respondents patients are sometimes referred unnecessarily to specialists. Also 'difficult' patients run the risk of unwarranted referral to specialists, and, moreover referrals because of insurance reasons are mentioned. The financial situation of the patient and the defensive behaviour of dental practitioners seem to be closely connected.

Explore related subjects

Keep this discovery

Explore connections, maps & timelines

BibTeXRIS

M A Eijkman, M H Assink, I M Hofmans-Okkes. 1997. Defensive dental behaviour: illusion or reality?. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-595x.1997.tb00793.x

Cite the original work for its findings. Save a collection to share your selection of sources.

KEEP EXPLORING

Related citations

Defensive medicine practices among gastroenterologists in Japan.

AIM: To clarify the prevalence of defensive medicine and the specific defensive medicine practices among gastroenterologists in Japan. METHODS: A survey of gastroenterologists in Hiroshima, Japan, was conducted by mail in March 2006. The number of gastroenterologists reporting defensive medicine behaviors or changes in their scope of practice and the reported defensive medicine practices, i.e., assurance and avoidance behaviors, were examined. RESULTS: A total of 131 (77%) out of 171 gastroenterologists completed the survey. Three (2%) respondents were sued, and most respondents (96%) had liability insurance. Nearly all respondents (98%) reported practicing defensive medicine. Avoidance behaviors, such as avoiding certain procedures or interventions and avoiding caring for high-risk patients, were very common (96%). Seventy-five percent of respondents reported often avoiding certain procedures or interventions. However, seasoned gastroenterologists (those in practice for more than 20 years) adopted avoidance behaviors significantly less often than those in practice for less than 10 years. Assurance behaviors, i.e., supplying additional services of marginal or no medical value, were also widespread (91%). Sixty-eight percent of respondents reported that they sometimes or often referred patients to other specialists unnecessarily. CONCLUSION: Defensive medicine may be highly prevalent among gastroenterologists throughout Japan, with potentially serious implications regarding costs, access, and both technical and interpersonal quality of care.

Defensive Medicine↗